Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences

Published by: Kowsar
Crossmark

Reconfiguring Universities for the Future: E-learning Resources and Instructional Designs in Training Translation

Mohammad Iman Askari ORCID 1 , *
Author Information
1 Department of English Language, Shahryar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahryar, Iran
Article information
  • Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences: June 30, 2019, 10 (2); e92646
  • Published Online: July 23, 2019
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: April 27, 2019
  • Revised: July 9, 2019
  • Accepted: July 10, 2019
  • DOI: 10.5812/ijvlms.92646

How to Cite: Askari M I. Reconfiguring Universities for the Future: E-learning Resources and Instructional Designs in Training Translation, Interdiscip J Virtual Learn Med Sci. 2019 ; 10(2):e92646. doi: 10.5812/ijvlms.92646.

Abstract
Copyright © 2019, Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
Acknowledgements
Footnotes
References
  • 1. Zehry K, Halder N, Theodosiou L. E-Learning in medical education in the United Kingdom. Proc Soc Behav Sci. 2011;15:3163-7. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.265.
  • 2. Beatty B, Ulasewicz C. Faculty perspectives on moving from blackboard to the moodle learning management system. TechTrends. 2006;50(4):36-45. doi: 10.1007/s11528-006-0036-y.
  • 3. Dashtestani R. English as a foreign language-teachers’ perspectives on implementing online instruction in the Iranian EFL context. Res Learn Technol. 2014;22. doi: 10.3402/rlt.v22.20142.
  • 4. Sales D. Towards a student-centred approach to information literacy learning: A focus group study on the information behaviour of translation and interpreting students. J Inf Literacy. 2008;2(1). doi: 10.11645/2.1.104.
  • 5. Kaplan AM, Haenlein M. Higher education and the digital revolution: About MOOCs, SPOCs, social media, and the Cookie Monster. Bus Horizons. 2016;59(4):441-50. doi: 10.1016/j.bushor.2016.03.008.
  • 6. Kučiš V, Seljan S, Klasnić K. Evaluation of electronic translation tools through quality parameters. Digital Resources and Knowledge Sharing Conference Proceeding. 2009.
  • 7. Sager JC. Language engineering and translation, consequences of automation. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company; 1994.
  • 8. Creswell JW. Research design qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. London: SAGE Publications; 2013.

Featured Image:

Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .
Readers' Comments