Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences

Published by: Kowsar

Investigating the Effect of Organizational Innovative Climate on Continuous Use of Electronic Teaching with the Role of Computer Self-Efficacy Among Male Teachers

Mahdi Moeinikia 1 , Adel Zahed-Babelan 1 , * , Seyyedmohammad Seyyedkalan 2 and Ghafar Karimianpur 2
Authors Information
1 Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Mohaghegh Ardabili University, Ardabil, IR Iran
2 Mohaghegh Ardabili University, Ardabil, IR Iran
Article information
  • Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences: December 2016, 7 (4); e10170
  • Published Online: December 28, 2016
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: October 31, 2016
  • Accepted: December 21, 2016
  • DOI: 10.5812/ijvlms.10170

To Cite: Moeinikia M, Zahed-Babelan A, Seyyedkalan S, Karimianpur G. Investigating the Effect of Organizational Innovative Climate on Continuous Use of Electronic Teaching with the Role of Computer Self-Efficacy Among Male Teachers, Interdiscip J Virtual Learn Med Sci. 2016 ; 7(4):e10170. doi: 10.5812/ijvlms.10170.

Copyright © 2016, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ( which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion and Conclusion
  • 1. Zolfaghari M, Sarmadi M, Negarandeh R, Zandi B, Ahmadi F. Attitudes of Nursing and Midwifery School's Faculty toward blended E-learning at Tehran University of medical sciences (In Persian). J Hayat. 2009; 15(1): 31-9
  • 2. Williams PE. Roles and competencies for distance education programs in higher education institutions. Am J Distance Educ. 2003; 17(1): 45-57[DOI]
  • 3. Olaniyi S. E-learning technology: The nigeria experience. Shaping the change: Xxiii fig congress. 2006;
  • 4. Torruam JT. Application of e-teaching and e-learning in Nigerian educational system. Academic Res Inter. 2012; 3(1): 30
  • 5. Marakas GM, Yi MY, Johnson RD. The multilevel and multifaceted character of computer self-efficacy: Toward clarification of the construct and an integrative framework for research. Inform Systems Res. 1998; 9(2): 126-63
  • 6. Chou CM, Hsiao HC, Shen CH, Chen SC. Analysis of factors in technological and vocational school teachers' perceived organizational innovative climate and continuous use of e-teaching: Using computer self-efficacy as an intervening variable. Turkish Online J Edu Technol. 2010; 9(4): 35-48
  • 7. Ho SC, Kauffman RJ, Liang TP. A growth theory perspective on B2C e-commerce growth in Europe: An exploratory study. Electron Commer Res Appl. 2007; 6(3): 237-59[DOI]
  • 8. Susser B, Ariga T. Teaching e-commerce Web page evaluation and design: a pilot study using tourism destination sites. Computers Education. 2006; 47(4): 399-413[DOI]
  • 9. Zaman M, Anandarajan M, Dai Q. Experiencing flow with instant messaging and its facilitating role on creative behaviors. Computers Human Behav. 2010; 26(5): 1009-8[DOI]
  • 10. Matulich E, Papp R, Haytko DL. Continuous Improvement through Teaching Innovations: a Requirement for Today's Learners. J Mark Educ. 2015; 18(1): 1-7[DOI]
  • 11. Qarabaghy H, Amir Timuori MH, Maghami HR. Examine the relationship between creativity and efficacy of computer technology in teaching undergraduate courses school psychology and educational sciences, Allameh Tabatabai university. J Innovation Creativity Human Sci. 2011; 1(2): 151-78
  • 12. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. 1997;
  • 13. Kinzie MB, Delcourt MA. Computer technologies in teacher education: The measurement of attitudes and self-efficacy. 1991;
  • 14. Wilfong JD. Computer anxiety and anger: the impact of computer use, computer experience, and self-efficacy beliefs. Computers Human Behav. 2006; 22(6): 1001-11[DOI]
  • 15. Dishaw M, Strong D, Bandy DB. Extending the task-technology fit model with self-efficacy constructs. AMCIS 2002 Proceedings. 2002; : 143
  • 16. Olivier TA, Shapiro F. Self-efficacy and computers. J Computer-Based Instruction. 1993; 20(3): 81-5
  • 17. Mustafa K, Bakir N. A needs assessment survey to investigate pre-service teachers' knowledge, experiences and perceptions about preparation to using educational technologies. Turkish Online J Edu Technol. 2010; 9(1)
  • 18. Saade RG, Kira D. Computer anxiety in e-learning: The effect of computer self-efficacy. J Inform Technol Edu. 2009; 8(1): 177-91
  • 19. Compeau DR, Higgins CA. Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS quarterly. 1995; 19(2): 189-211
  • 20. Oproiu GC. A study about using e-learning platform (moodle) in university teaching process. Procedia-Social Behav Sci. 2015; 180: 426-32
  • 21. Gist ME, Schwoerer C, Rosen B. Effects of alternative training methods on self-efficacy and performance in computer software training. J Applied Psychol. 1989; 74(6): 884-91[DOI]
  • 22. Sang G, Valcke M, Braak JV, Tondeur J. Student teachers’ thinking processes and ICT integration: Predictors of prospective teaching behaviors with educational technology. Computer Educ. 2010; 54(1): 103-12[DOI]
  • 23. Karsten R, Roth RM. Computer self-efficacy: A practical indicator of student computer competency in introductory IS courses. Informing Sci. 1998; 1(3): 61-8
  • 24. Bates R, Khasawneh S. Self-efficacy and college students’ perceptions and use of online learning systems. Computers Human Behav. 2007; 23(1): 175-91[DOI]
  • 25. Moreno F, Bailly-Bailliere M. Dise-o instructivo de la formación on-line. . 2002; : 26
  • 26. Stacey E, Wiesenberg F. A study of face-to-face and online teaching philosophies in Canada and Australia. Inter J E-Learning Distance Education. 2007; 22(1): 19-40
  • 27. Bocchi B, Dozza L, Chianese G, Cavrini G. School climate: Comparison between parents' and teachers' perception. Procedia-Social Behav Sci. 2014; 116: 4643-9
  • 28. Gumusluoglu L, Ilsev A. Transformational leadership, creativity, and organizational innovation. J Business Res. 2009; 62(4): 461-73
  • 29. Huang E, Chuang MH. Extending the theory of planned behaviour as a model to explain post-merger employee behaviour of IS use. Computer Human Behav. 2007; 23(1): 240-57[DOI]
  • 30. Neill S, McKee D, Rose GM. Developing the organization's sensemaking capability: Precursor to an adaptive strategic marketing response. Indus Market Manage. 2007; 36(6): 731-44[DOI]
  • 31. Borne JE. Analysis of organizational climate factors as predictors of job satisfaction and job stress for community college counselors. 2008;
  • 32. Basu R. An empirical examination of leader-member exchange and transformational leadership as predictors of innovative behavior. 1991;
  • 33. Mihm J, Loch CH, Wilkinson D, Huberman BA. Hierarchical structure and search in complex organizations. Manage Sci. 2010; 56(5): 831-48[DOI]
  • 34. McMurray A, Scott D. The relationship between organizational climate and organizational culture. J American Academy Business, Cambridge. 2003; 3(1): 1-8
  • 35. Chang JC, Yang YL. The effect of organization's innovational climate on student's creative self-efficacy and innovative behavior. Business Entrepreneurship J. 2012; 1(1): 75-100
  • 36. Chang CP, Chuang HW, Bennington L. Organizational climate for innovation and creative teaching in urban and rural schools. Qual Quant. 2010; 45(4): 935-51[DOI]
  • 37. Rashidi B, Avizhgan M. Implementation and evaluation of electronic teaching of practical and theoretical histology courses: A new experience at isfahan university of medical science [in Persian]. Iran J Med Edu. 2012; 11(9): 1214-22
  • 38. Hung S, Liang T, Chang C. A meta-analysis of empirical research using TAM. J Inform Manag. 2005; 12(4): 211-34
  • 39. Bassam H. The influence of specific computer experiences on computer self-efficacy beliefs. Computers Human Behav. 2003; 19(4): 443-50
  • 40. Paraskeva F, Bouta H, Papagianni A. Individual characteristics and computer self-efficacy in secondary education teachers to integrate technology in educational practice. Computers & Education. 2008; 50(3): 1084-91
  • 41. Pellas N. The influence of computer self-efficacy, metacognitive self-regulation and self-esteem on student engagement in online learning programs: Evidence from the virtual world of Second Life. Computers Human Behav. 2014; 35: 157-70[DOI]
  • 42. Reuvers M, van Engen ML, Vinkenburg CJ, Wilson-Evered E. Transformational leadership and innovative work behaviour: Exploring the relevance of gender differences. Creativity Innovation Manage. 2008; 17(3): 227-44[DOI]
  • 43. Yang S. The structural equation modeling construction and the sex structure invariance assessment of factors affecting innovative behavior of information infused instruction for elementary school teachers. Bulletin Edu Psychol. 2009; 40(3): 385-418
  • 44. Teo T. Modelling technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers. Computers Edu. 2009; 52(2): 302-12[DOI]
  • 45. Weigl T, Hartmann E, Jahns C, Darkow IL. Inter-organizational network structures in Russia: organizational changes from institutional and social embeddedness perspectives. Human Resource Develop Inter. 2008; 11(2): 151-65[DOI]
  • 46. Brinkerhoff J. Effects of a long-duration, professional development academy on technology skills, computer self-efficacy, and technology integration beliefs and practices. J Res Technol Edu. 2006; 39(1): 22-43[DOI]
  • 47. Vajargah KF, Jahani S, Azadmanesh N. Application of ICTS in teaching and learning at university level: The case of shahid beheshti university. Turkish Online J Edu Technol. 2010; 9(2)
  • 48. Anderson S, Maninger R. Preservice teachers' abilities, beliefs, and intentions regarding technology integration. J Edu Computing Res. 2007; 37(2): 151-72[DOI]
  • 49. King EB, Chermont K, West M, Dawson JF, Hebl MR. How innovation can alleviate negative consequences of demanding work contexts: The influence of climate for innovation on organizational outcomes. J Occupation Organization Psychol. 2007; 80(4): 631-45[DOI]
  • 50. Raminmehr KH, Charsetad P. Quantitative research methods using structural equation modeling (In Persian). 2013;
  • 51. Kalantari K. Books processing and analysis of data on socio-economic research (In Persian). 2009;
  • 52. Hooman HA. Structural equation modeling with application lisrel software (in persian). 2009;
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:



Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments