How to Cite:
S A, Arabzadeh
G H . Role of Organizational Culture in Acceptance of Technology Among Teachers of Smart Schools Based on the Technology Acceptance Model: A Case Study of High Schools of Karaj City,
Interdiscip J Virtual Learn Med Sci.
Luan WS, Teo T. Investigating the technology acceptance among student teachers in Malaysia: An application of the technology acceptance model (TAM). Asia-Pac Educ Res. 2009;18(2). doi: 10.3860/taper.v18i2.1327.
Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intension and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. 1st ed. Boston: Addison-Wesley Address; 1975.
Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Manage Sci. 1989;35(8):982-1003. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982.
Teo T. Modelling technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers. Comput Educ. 2009;52(2):302-12. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.08.006.
Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 1989;13(3):319. doi: 10.2307/249008.
Venkatesh V, Morris M, Davis GB, Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Q. 2003;27(3):425. doi: 10.2307/30036540.
Tsai YR. Applying the technology acceptance model (TAM) to explore the effects of a course management system (CMS)-assisted efl writing instruction. CALICO J. 2014;32(1):153-71. doi: 10.1558/calico.v32i1.25961.
Ghanbari S, Karimi I. [The effect of information technology and communication training for effective adoption of IT based technology acceptance model (TAM)]. Public Adm Perspect. Persian.
Venkatesh V, Davis FD. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Manage Sci. 2000;46(2):186-204. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.184.108.40.20626.
Venkatesh V, Morris MG. Why don't men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Q. 2000;24(1):115. doi: 10.2307/3250981.
Akinbobola OI, Adeleke AA. External variables as antecedents of users perception in virtual library usage. Interdiscip J Inf Knowl Manage. 2016;11:73-87. doi: 10.28945/3450.
Denison DR. Organizational culture: Can it be a key lever for driving organizational change? In: Cooper CL CSEP, editor. The international handbook of organizational culture and climate. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 2000. p. 347-76.
Denison D, Lief C, Ward JL. Culture in family-owned enterprises: Recognizing and leveraging unique strengths. Fam Bus Rev. 2016;17(1):61-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2004.00004.x.
Zhu C. Organisational culture and technology-enhanced innovation in higher education. Technol Pedagogy Educ. 2013;24(1):65-79. doi: 10.1080/1475939x.2013.822414.
Silic M, Back A. Organizational culture impact on acceptance and use of unified communications and collaboration technology in organizations. Measur Bus Excel. 2013;20(1):21-40.
Tabibi S, Farhangi AA, Nasiripour AA, Baradaran Kazemzadeh R, Ebrahimi P. [Assessment the related factors to hospital information system acceptance]. JHPM. 2014;3(1):14-26. Persian.
Kothaneth S. The relationship between organizational culture, usability, and instructional technology acceptance [dissertation]. The Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; 2012.
Ardalan MR, Salimi Q, Rajaeepour S, Molavy H. [A study of relationship between person-organization fit and organizational culture in western iran state universities (Hamedan, Kermanshah and Kordestan)]. IRPHE. 2008;14(1):97-131. Persian.
Goodarzvand Chegini M, Ismaili S. [The study of organizational culture associated with the adoption of an integrated model for the adoption and use of information technology in hospitals in Rasht]. Payavard Salamat. 2015;9(1):29-42. Persian.
Abbasi Asl M, Zahed Babelan A, Namvar Y. [The study of related factors to guidance school teachers using amount from ICT in Teaching and Learning process]. Education. 2011;13(4):95-106. Persian.
Srite M. Culture as an explanation of technology acceptance differences: An empirical investigation of chinese and us users. Australasian J Inf Sys. 2006;14(1). doi: 10.3127/ajis.v14i1.4.
Kothaneth S. A pilot study on the cross-cultural acceptance of technology. Proc Hum Fac Ergonomics Soc An Meet. 2010;54(23):1951-5. doi: 10.1177/154193121005402310.
Teo T, Huang F, Hoi CKW. Explicating the influences that explain intention to use technology among English teachers in China. Interact Learn Environ. 2017;26(4):460-75. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2017.1341940.
Teo T, Faruk Ursavaş O, Bahçekapili E. Efficiency of the technology acceptance model to explain pre‐service teachers' intention to use technology. Campus-Wide Inf Sys. 2011;28(2):93-101. doi: 10.1108/10650741111117798.
Gardner C, Amoroso DL. Development of an instrument to measure the acceptance of Internet technology by consumers. 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Big Island, USA. IEEE; 2004. p. 1-10.
Rahimnia F, Alizadeh M. [The study of organizational culture dimensions based on the denison model for faculties of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad]. Educ Psychol Stud. 2009;35(24):147-70. Persian.
Mortazavi M, Shabani A, Rajaei Pour S, Azarbakhsh AM. [Study of organizational culture of the national library of the islamic republic based on the denison model]. NASTINFO. 2014;25(4):24-40. Persian.
Creemers BPM. From school effectiveness and school improvement to effective school improvement: Background, theoretical analysis, and outline of the empirical study. Educ Res Eval. 2010;8(4):343-62. doi: 10.1076/edre.8.4.343.8814.
Flores MA. The impact of school culture and leadership on new teachers' learning in the workplace. Int J Leadership Educ. 2004;7(4):297-318. doi: 10.1080/1360312042000226918.
Teo T. Factors influencing teachers’ intention to use technology: Model development and test. Comput Educ. 2011;57(4):2432-40. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.008.
Chien SP, Wu HK, Hsu YS. An investigation of teachers’ beliefs and their use of technology-based assessments. Comput Hum Behav. 2014;31:198-210. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.037.
Oye ND, A.Iahad N, Ab.Rahim N. The history of UTAUT model and its impact on ICT acceptance and usage by academicians. Educ Inf Technol. 2012;19(1):251-70. doi: 10.1007/s10639-012-9189-9.
Ifenthaler D, Schweinbenz V. The acceptance of Tablet-PCs in classroom instruction: The teachers’ perspectives. Comput Hum Behav. 2013;29(3):525-34. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.11.004.
Pynoo B, Devolder P, Tondeur J, van Braak J, Duyck W, Duyck P. Predicting secondary school teachers’ acceptance and use of a digital learning environment: A cross-sectional study. Comput Hum Behav. 2011;27(1):568-75. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.10.005.
Zakeri AH, Haji Khajehlu S, Afraei H, Zangui S. [Study of teachers' attitude towards the application of educational technologies in the teaching process]. Educ Psychol Stud. 2011;6(6):27-46. Persian.
Wong KT, Teo T, Russo S. Influence of gender and computer teaching efficacy on computer acceptance among Malaysian student teachers: An extended technology acceptance model. Australasian J Educ Technol. 2012;28(7). doi: 10.14742/ajet.796.
Baydas O, Goktas Y. Influential factors on preservice teachers' intentions to use ICT in future lessons. Comput Hum Behav. 2016;56:170-8. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.030.