Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences

Published by: Kowsar

Investigating the Factors Affecting the Intention to Use E-Learning from the Viewpoint of Higher Education Students

Fatemeh Makkizadeh 1 , * and Alireza Afshani 1
Authors Information
1 Faculty of Social Sciences, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran
Article information
  • Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences: 10 (1); e85806
  • Published Online: March 9, 2019
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: October 27, 2018
  • Revised: January 21, 2019
  • Accepted: January 22, 2019
  • DOI: 10.5812/ijvlms.85806

To Cite: Makkizadeh F, Afshani A. Investigating the Factors Affecting the Intention to Use E-Learning from the Viewpoint of Higher Education Students, Interdiscip J Virtual Learn Med Sci. Online ahead of Print ; 10(1):e85806. doi: 10.5812/ijvlms.85806.

Copyright © 2019, Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ( which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
  • 1. Katz YJ. The comparative suitability of three ICT distance learning methodologies for college level instruction. Educ Media Int. 2000;37(1):25-30. doi: 10.1080/095239800361482.
  • 2. Moore MG, Kearsley G. Distance education: A systems view. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth; 1996.
  • 3. Admiraal W, Huizenga J, Akkerman S, Dam G. The concept of flow in collaborative game-based learning. Comput Hum Behav. 2011;27(3):1185-94. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.12.013.
  • 4. Santos WO, Bittencourt II, Isotani S, Silveira FI, Marques LB. Challenges of flow theory applied to computers in education. IV Workshop of Challenges of Computer in Education. Recife-PE, Brazil.[GS Search]. 2015.
  • 5. Challco GC, Moreira D, Mizoguchi R, Isotani S. Towards an ontology for gamifying collaborative learning scenarios. International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Springer; 2014. p. 404-9.
  • 6. dos Santos WO, Gomes T, Silva C. Towards to flow state identification in educational games: An empirical study. Brazilian Symposium on Computers in Education (Simpósio Brasileiro de Informática na Educação-SBIE). 2017. 927 p.
  • 7. Csikszentmihalyi M. Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harpers Perennial; 1990.
  • 8. Rha I, Williams MD, Heo G. Optimal flow experience in web-based instruction. Asia Pac Educ Rev. 2005;6(1):50-8. doi: 10.1007/bf03024967.
  • 9. Webster J, Trevino LK, Ryan L. The dimensionality and correlates of flow in human-computer interactions. Comput Human Behav. 1993;9(4):411-26. doi: 10.1016/0747-5632(93)90032-N.
  • 10. Novak TP, Hoffman DL, Yung YF. Modeling the structure of the flow experience among web users. INFORMS Marketing Science and the Internet Mini-Conference. Boston, MA. 1998.
  • 11. Ibáñez MB, Di Serio Á, Villarán D, Kloos CD. Experimenting with electromagnetism using augmented reality: Impact on flow student experience and educational effectiveness. Comput Educ. 2014;71:1-13.
  • 12. Hsieh Y, Hou H, Lin Y. Exploring the role of flow experience, learning performance and potential behavior clusters in elementary students' game-based learning. Interact Learn Envir. 2016;24(1):178-93. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2016.834827.
  • 13. Oliveira dos Santos W, Bittencourt II, Isotani S, Dermeval D, Brandão Marques L, Frango Silveira I. Flow theory to promote learning in educational systems: Is it really relevant? Braz J Comput Educ. 2018;26(2):29. doi: 10.5753/rbie.2018.26.02.29.
  • 14. Chan TS, Ahern TC. Targeting motivation: Adapting flow theory to instructional design. J Educ Comput Res. 2016;21(2):151-63. doi: 10.2190/uj04-t5yb-yfxe-0bg2.
  • 15. Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace1. J Appl Soc Psychol. 1992;22(14):1111-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x.
  • 16. Liao LF. A flow theory perspective on learner motivation and behavior in distance education. Distance Educ. 2006;27(1):45-62. doi: 10.1080/01587910600653215.
  • 17. Lin KY, Lu HP. Why people use social networking sites: An empirical study integrating network externalities and motivation theory. Comput Hum Behav. 2011;27(3):1152-61. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.12.009.
  • 18. Liu SH, Liao HL, Pratt JA. Impact of media richness and flow on e-learning technology acceptance. Comput Educ. 2009;52(3):599-607. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.11.002.
  • 19. Hamari J, Shernoff DJ, Rowe E, Coller B, Asbell-Clarke J, Edwards T. Challenging games help students learn: An empirical study on engagement, flow and immersion in game-based learning. Comput Hum Behav. 2016;54:170-9. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.045.
  • 20. Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PIR. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Manag Sci. 1989;35(8):982-1003. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982.
  • 21. Finneran CM, Zhang P. A person–artefact–task (PAT) model of flow antecedents in computer-mediated environments. Int J Hum-Comput St. 2003;59(4):475-96. doi: 10.1016/s1071-5819(03)00112-5.
  • 22. Liu CC, Chang IC. Measuring the flow experience of players playing online games. PACIS. 2012. 104 p.
  • 23. Ghani JA, Deshpande SP. Task characteristics and the experience of optimal flow in human-computer interaction. J Psychol. 1994;128(4):381-91. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1994.9712742.
  • 24. Lin KM. e-Learning continuance intention: Moderating effects of user e-learning experience. Comput Educ. 2011;56(2):515-26. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.017.
  • 25. Ghani JA. Flow in human computer interactions: Test of a model. In: Carey J, editor. Human factors in information systems: Emerging theoretical bases. Norwood, NJ: Ablex; 1995. p. 291-311.

Featured Image:

Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:



Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments