Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences

Published by: Kowsar
Uncorrected Proof scheduled for 10 (1)

Comparison of Flipped Classroom and Conceptual Map on Students’ Deliberate Practice Study Approach

Amin Haghgoo 1 , Mahmood Karimy 1 , Meysam Rahmani Katigari 2 , * , Mohadese Bolhasani 3 , Ghazal Afsheh 3 and Behnam Jafari 4
Authors Information
1 Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Saveh University of Medical Sciences, Saveh, Iran
2 School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3 Student Research Committee, Saveh University of Medical Sciences, Saveh, Iran
4 Student Research Committee, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran
Article information
  • Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences: In Press (In Press); e85240
  • Published Online: March 4, 2019
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: October 11, 2018
  • Revised: January 10, 2019
  • Accepted: January 14, 2019
  • DOI: 10.5812/ijvlms.85240

To Cite: Haghgoo A, Karimy M, Rahmani Katigari M, Bolhasani M, Afsheh G, et al. Comparison of Flipped Classroom and Conceptual Map on Students’ Deliberate Practice Study Approach, Interdiscip J Virtual Learn Med Sci. Online ahead of Print ; In Press(In Press):e85240. doi: 10.5812/ijvlms.85240.

Abstract
Copyright © 2019, Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
Acknowledgements
Footnotes
References
  • 1. Brockbank A, McGill I. Facilitating reflective learning in higher education. McGraw-Hill Education (UK); 2007.
  • 2. Biggs JB. Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does. Open University Press; 2003.
  • 3. Kolb AY, Kolb DA. Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Acad Manage Learn Educ. 2005;4(2):193-212. doi: 10.5465/amle.2005.17268566.
  • 4. Raines DA. CAN-Care: An innovative model of practice-based learning. Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2006;3:Article 20. doi: 10.2202/1548-923X.1304. [PubMed: 17049040].
  • 5. Shakurnia A, Alijani H, Najjar S, Elhampour H. [Correlation between educational satisfaction and approaches to study and academic performance a study of nursing and midwifery students]. Iran J Med Educ. 2014;14(2):101-9. Persian.
  • 6. Ericsson KA, Krampe RT, Tesch-Römer C. The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psycholog Rev. 1993;100(3):363. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.100.3.363.
  • 7. Moulaert V, Verwijnen MG, Rikers R, Scherpbier AJ. The effects of deliberate practice in undergraduate medical education. Med Educ. 2004;38(10):1044-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01954.x. [PubMed: 15461649].
  • 8. Ericsson KA, Whyte J, Ward P. Expert performance in nursing: reviewing research on expertise in nursing within the framework of the expert-performance approach. ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2007;30(1):E58-71. doi: 10.1097/00012272-200701000-00014. [PubMed: 17299276].
  • 9. Hasheesh MA, Al-Mostafa O, Obeidat H. Traditional versus nontraditional methods of teaching: The impact on nursing teaching effectiveness and student‘s achievements at nursing colleges. An Najah Univ J Res. 2011;25(1):255-75.
  • 10. Zahbyon L, Ahmadi GR. Creative thinking and its` relation to students `academic achievement. Curriculum Planning Know Res Educ Sci. 2009;23(21):61-78.
  • 11. Rahmani A, Mohajjel Aghdam A, Fathi Azar E, Abdullahzadeh F. [Comparing the effects of concept mapping and integration method on nursing students' learning in nursing process course in Tabriz University of Medical Sciences]. Iran J Med Educ. 2007;7(1):41-9. Persian.
  • 12. Race P. The lecturer's toolkit: A practical guide to assessment, learning and teaching. London: Routledge; 2014. 300 p. doi: 10.4324/9781315767277.
  • 13. Tan C, Yue WG, Fu Y. Effectiveness of flipped classrooms in nursing education: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Chinese Nursing Research. 2017;4(4):192-200. doi: 10.1016/j.cnre.2017.10.006.
  • 14. Rahman AA, Aris B, Mohamed H, Zaid NM. The influences of flipped classroom: A meta analysis. 2014 IEEE 6th Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED). IEEE; 2014. p. 24-8.
  • 15. Gomes AP, Dias-Coelho UC, Cavalheiro PO, Siqueira-Batista R. The role of concept maps in the medical education. Rev Bras Educ Med. 2011;35(2):275-82. doi: 10.1590/S0100-55022011000200018.
  • 16. Mitchell DL, Bennett MJ, Manfrin-Ledet L. Spiritual development of nursing students: Developing competence to provide spiritual care to patients at the end of life. J Nurs Educ. 2006;45(9):365-70. [PubMed: 17002083].
  • 17. McLaughlin JE, Roth MT, Glatt DM, Gharkholonarehe N, Davidson CA, Griffin LM, et al. The flipped classroom: A course redesign to foster learning and engagement in a health professions school. Acad Med. 2014;89(2):236-43. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000086. [PubMed: 24270916].
  • 18. Sharples M, Adams A, Ferguson R, Mark G, McAndrew P, Rienties B, et al. Innovating pedagogy 2014: Exploring new forms of teaching, learning and assessment, to guide educators and policy makers. The Open University; 2014.
  • 19. Bishop JL, Verleger MA. The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. ASEE National Conference Proceedings. Atlanta, GA. 2013. p. 1-18.
  • 20. Dalmolin LCD, Nassar SM, Bastos RC, Mateus GP. A concept map extractor tool for teaching and learning. 2009 Ninth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies. IEEE; 2009. p. 18-20.
  • 21. Masoumy M, Ebadi A, Daneshmandi M, Raisifar A. Concept mapping; modern teaching strategy in nursing education. Educt Strategies J. 2011;4(1):47-51.
  • 22. Aein F, Frouzandeh N. [Investigating efficacy of concept mapping in student’s learning of nursing process of pediatric patients]. J Shahrekord Uuniv Med Sci. 2012;14(2). Persian.
  • 23. Sadeghi-Gandomani HR, Delaram M, Naseri-Brugeni N. [Comparison of concept mapping and conventional teaching methods on creativity of nursing students]. J Med Educ Dev. 2014;9(3):48-57. Persian.
  • 24. Nili MR, Abdi H. The relationship of study approach with deliberative practice, course satisfaction and academic achievement among Isfahan University Of Medical Sciences nursing students during the 2013-2014 academic year. J Nurs Educ. 2016;5(2 (16)).
  • 25. Kaddoura M, Van-Dyke O, Yang Q. Impact of a concept map teaching approach on nursing students' critical thinking skills. Nurs Health Sci. 2016;18(3):350-4. doi: 10.1111/nhs.12277. [PubMed: 26891960].
  • 26. Chen SL, Liang T, Lee ML, Liao IC. Effects of concept map teaching on students' critical thinking and approach to learning and studying. J Nurs Educ. 2011;50(8):466-9. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20110415-06. [PubMed: 21524017].
  • 27. Lee W, Chiang CH, Liao IC, Lee ML, Chen SL, Liang T. The longitudinal effect of concept map teaching on critical thinking of nursing students. Nurse Educ Today. 2013;33(10):1219-23. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2012.06.010. [PubMed: 22795871].
  • 28. Kalhor M, Mehran G. The impact of concept mapping strategy on academic achievement and meaningful learning of english reading comprehension in students. J Nurs Educ. 2017;6(1). doi: 10.21859/jne-06015.
  • 29. Boyadjian-Samawi Z. The effect of concept mapping on critical thinking skills and dispositions of junior and senior baccalaureate nursing students. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Concept Mapping. San Jose, Costa Rica: University of Costa Rica. 2006.
  • 30. Moffett J, Mill AC. Evaluation of the flipped classroom approach in a veterinary professional skills course. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2014;5:415-25. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S70160. [PubMed: 25419164]. [PubMed Central: PMC4235505].
  • 31. Young TP, Bailey CJ, Guptill M, Thorp AW, Thomas TL. The flipped classroom: A modality for mixed asynchronous and synchronous learning in a residency program. West J Emerg Med. 2014;15(7):938-44. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2014.10.23515. [PubMed: 25493157]. [PubMed Central: PMC4251258].
  • 32. Whillier S, Lystad RP. No differences in grades or level of satisfaction in a flipped classroom for neuroanatomy. J Chiropr Educ. 2015;29(2):127-33. doi: 10.7899/JCE-14-28. [PubMed: 25902472]. [PubMed Central: PMC4582610].
  • 33. Jensen JL, Kummer TA, Godoy PM. Improvements from a flipped classroom may simply be the fruits of active learning. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2015;14(1):ar5. doi: 10.1187/cbe.14-08-0129. [PubMed: 25699543]. [PubMed Central: PMC4353080].
  • 34. Overmyer GR. The flipped classroom model for college algebra: Effects on student achievement [dissertation]. Fort Collins, Colorad: Colorado State University; 2014.
  • 35. Saeedi A, Saif AA, Asadzadeh H, Qavam SE. Comparing effectiveness of methods of presentation and providing concept maps on reading comprehension. Eur J Exp Biology. 2013;3(2):545-50.
  • 36. Markow PG, Lonning RA. Usefulness of concept maps in college chemistry laboratories: Students' perceptions and effects on achievement. Official J Nation Assoc Res Sci Teach. 1998;35(9):1015-29. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199811)35:9<1015::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-G.
  • 37. Stoyanova N, Kommers P. Concept mapping as a medium of shared cognition in computer-supported collaborative problem solving. J Interactive Learn Res. 2002;13(1):111-33.

Featured Image:

Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments