Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences

Published by: Kowsar

Efficacy of Using Social Networks in Learning and Teaching Based on Self-Determination Theory: An Interventional Study

Elham Akbari 1 , * and Robert-Jan Simons 2
Authors Information
1 Education Department, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
2 Professor of Educational Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Article information
  • Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences: December 31, 2018, 9 (4); e84540
  • Published Online: December 19, 2018
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: September 24, 2018
  • Revised: November 24, 2018
  • Accepted: November 24, 2018
  • DOI: 10.5812/ijvlms.84540

To Cite: Akbari E, Simons R. Efficacy of Using Social Networks in Learning and Teaching Based on Self-Determination Theory: An Interventional Study, Interdiscip J Virtual Learn Med Sci. 2018 ; 9(4):e84540. doi: 10.5812/ijvlms.84540.

Copyright © 2018, Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ( which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
  • 1. Akbari E. The role of online social networks in teaching and learning a foreign language [dissertation]. Utrecht University Repository; 2016.
  • 2. Rennie F, Mason R. E-learning and social network handbook: Resources for higher education. Madison Ave, New York: Routhlege; 2008.
  • 3. Selwyn N. Faceworking: Exploring students' education‐related use of Facebook. Learn Media Tech. 2009;34(2):157-74. doi: 10.1080/17439880902923622.
  • 4. Espuny Vidal C, González Martínez J, Lleixà Fortuño M, Gisbert Cervera M. University students' attitudes towards and expectations of the educational use of social networks. Revista de Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento (RUSC). 2011;8(1):186-99.
  • 5. Akbari E, Naderi A, Hosseinzadeh Yazdi M, Simons RJ, Pilot A. Attitude of teachers and students towards formal learning through online social networks. J Int Learn Res. 2016;27(2):101-23.
  • 6. Harrison R, Thomas M. Identity in online communities: Social networking sites and language learning. Int J Emerg Tech Soc. 2009;7(2):109-24.
  • 7. Godwin-Jones R. Emerging technologies: Web-writing 2.0: Enabling, documenting, and assessing writing online. Lang Learn Technol. 2008;12(2):7-13.
  • 8. Baralt M. The use of social networking sites for language practice and learning. Brazil: Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC); 2009.
  • 9. Clark C, Gruba S. The use of social networking sites for foreign language learning. Conference on Curriculum,Technology & Transformation for an Unknown Future. Sydney, Australia. 2010. p. 164-73.
  • 10. Lomicka L, Lord G. The next generation: Social networking and online collaboration in foreign language learning. Computer Assisted Language Instruction Consortium (CALICO); 2009. p. 1-11.
  • 11. Alsaif S, Li AS, Soh B. A snapshot survey of Saudi higher education students' perceptions of SNSs and Web 2.0 as a support learning tool based on the proposed social learning hub model. Int J Serv Econ Manag. 2017;8(4):287-310.
  • 12. Blattner G, Fiori M. Facebook in the language classroom: Promises and possibilities. Int J Instr Tech Distance Learn. 2009;6(1):17-28.
  • 13. Kabilan MK, Ahmad N, Zainol Abidin MJ. Facebook: An online environment for learning of English in institutions of higher education? Internet High Educ. 2010;13(4):179-87. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.07.003.
  • 14. Pattanapichet F, Wichadee S. Using space in social media to promote undergraduate students' critical thinking skills. Turk Online J Distance Educ. 2015;16(4):38-49. doi: 10.17718/tojde.94170.
  • 15. Roblyer MD, McDaniel M, Webb M, Herman J, Witty JV. Findings on Facebook in higher education: A comparison of college faculty and student uses and perceptions of social networking sites. Internet High Educ. 2010;13(3):134-40. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.03.002.
  • 16. Deci E, Ryan RM. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Publishing Co; 1985.
  • 17. Deci E, Ryan RM. A motivational approach to self. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. 38. Perspectives on motivation; 1991. p. 237-88.
  • 18. Deci EL, Ryan RM. Promoting self‐determined education. Scand J Educ Res. 1994;38(1):3-14. doi: 10.1080/0031383940380101.
  • 19. Pintrich PR, Schunk DH. Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. Ohio: Merrill; 1996.
  • 20. White RW. Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychol Rev. 1959;66:297-333. [PubMed: 13844397].
  • 21. Kennedy J. The effects of self determination, theory on learning. The University of North Carolina at Greensboro (UNCG ); 2007.
  • 22. Moynihan DP, Pandey SK. The ties that bind: Social networks, person-organization value fit, and turnover intention. J Publ Adm Res Theor. 2007;18(2):205-27. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mum013.
  • 23. Sørebø Ø, Halvari H, Gulli VF, Kristiansen R. The role of self-determination theory in explaining teachers’ motivation to continue to use E-learning technology. Comput Educ. 2009;53(4):1177-87. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.001.
  • 24. Chen KC, Jang SJ. Motivation in online learning: Testing a model of self-determination theory. Comput Hum Behav. 2010;26(4):741-52. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.01.011.
  • 25. Ala-Mutka K. Learning in informal online networks and communities. Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS) of the Joint Research Centre (JRC); 2010.

Featured Image:

Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .
Readers' Comments