Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences

Published by: Kowsar

Applicability and Necessity of E-Learning Courses Based on Participants’ Viewpoints in a Summer School

Zahra Karimian 1 , *
Author Information
1 Virtual School and Center of Excellence in Electronic Learning, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
Article information
  • Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences: September 2018, 9 (3); e81061
  • Published Online: October 1, 2018
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: June 20, 2018
  • Revised: September 10, 2018
  • Accepted: September 12, 2018
  • DOI: 10.5812/ijvlms.81061

To Cite: Karimian Z. Applicability and Necessity of E-Learning Courses Based on Participants’ Viewpoints in a Summer School, Interdiscip J Virtual Learn Med Sci. 2018 ; 9(3):e81061. doi: 10.5812/ijvlms.81061.

Abstract
Copyright © 2018, Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
References
  • 1. Triola MM, Huwendiek S, Levinson AJ, Cook DA. New directions in e-learning research in health professions education: Report of two symposia. Med Teach. 2012;34(1):e15-20. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.638010. [PubMed: 22250691].
  • 2. Duong VT. The role of e-learning, management, enterprise and benchmarking in the 21st century. Budapest Conference. 2016. p. 239-50.
  • 3. Pande D, Wadhai VM, Thakare VM. E-learning system and higher education. Int J Comput Sci Mobile Comput (IJCSM). 2016;5(2):274-80.
  • 4. Sangrà A, Vlachopoulos D, Cabrera N. Building an inclusive definition of e-learning: An approach to the conceptual framework. Int Rev Res Open Distrib Learn. 2012;13(2):145. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v13i2.1161.
  • 5. Amin FMH, Salih NK. New model to achieve software quality assurance in e-learning application. Int J Comput Sci Issues. 2017;14(3):65-9. doi: 10.20943/01201703.6569.
  • 6. Back DA, Behringer F, Harms T, Plener J, Sostmann K, Peters H. Survey of e-learning implementation and faculty support strategies in a cluster of mid-European medical schools. BMC Med Educ. 2015;15:145. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0420-4. [PubMed: 26337447]. [PubMed Central: PMC4560086].
  • 7. Hartshorne R, Ajjan H. Examining student decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests. J Comput Higher Educat. 2009;21(3):183-98. doi: 10.1007/s12528-009-9023-6.
  • 8. Güzer B, Caner H. The past, present and future of blended learning: An in depth analysis of literature. Procedia Social Behav Sci. 2014;116:4596-603. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.992.
  • 9. Choules AP. The use of e-learning in medical education: A review of the current situation. Postgrad Med J. 2007;83(978):212-6. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2006.054189. [PubMed: 17403945]. [PubMed Central: PMC2600032].
  • 10. Masic I. E-learning as new method of medical education. Acta Inform Med. 2008;16(2):102-17. doi: 10.5455/aim.2008.16.102-117. [PubMed: 24109154]. [PubMed Central: PMC3789161].
  • 11. Cook DA, Levinson AJ, Garside S, Dupras DM, Erwin PJ, Montori VM. Internet-based learning in the health professions: A meta-analysis. JAMA. 2008;300(10):1181-96. doi: 10.1001/jama.300.10.1181. [PubMed: 18780847].
  • 12. Lim SJ, Khan AM, De Silva M, Lim KS, Hu Y, Tan CH, et al. The implementation of e-learning tools to enhance undergraduate bioinformatics teaching and learning: A case study in the National University of Singapore. BMC Bioinformatics. 2009;10 Suppl 15. S12. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-S15-S12. [PubMed: 19958511]. [PubMed Central: PMC2788352].
  • 13. Miyazoe T, Anderson T. Learning outcomes and students' perceptions of online writing: Simultaneous implementation of a forum, blog, and wiki in an EFL blended learning setting. System. 2010;38(2):185-99. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2010.03.006.
  • 14. Cook DA, Levinson AJ, Garside S, Dupras DM, Erwin PJ, Montori VM. Instructional design variations in internet-based learning for health professions education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Med. 2010;85(5):909-22. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181d6c319. [PubMed: 20520049].
  • 15. Karaman S. Nurses' perceptions of online continuing education. BMC Med Educ. 2011;11:86. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-11-86. [PubMed: 22013974]. [PubMed Central: PMC3215975].
  • 16. Dunham MW, Ghirtis K, Beleh M. The use of virtual laboratories and other web-based tools in a drug assay course. Am J Pharm Educ. 2012;76(5):84. doi: 10.5688/ajpe76584. [PubMed: 22761525]. [PubMed Central: PMC3386035].
  • 17. George PP, Papachristou N, Belisario JM, Wang W, Wark PA, Cotic Z, et al. Online e-learning for undergraduates in health professions: A systematic review of the impact on knowledge, skills, attitudes and satisfaction. J Glob Health. 2014;4(1):10406. doi: 10.7189/jogh.04.010406. [PubMed: 24976965]. [PubMed Central: PMC4073252].
  • 18. Gaikwad N, Tankhiwale S. Interactive e-learning module in pharmacology: A pilot project at a rural medical college in India. Perspect Med Educ. 2014;3(1):15-30. doi: 10.1007/s40037-013-0081-0. [PubMed: 24072666]. [PubMed Central: PMC3890000].
  • 19. Aryal KR, Pereira J. E learning in surgery. Indian J Surg. 2014;76(6):487-93. doi: 10.1007/s12262-014-1092-8. [PubMed: 25614725]. [PubMed Central: PMC4297999].
  • 20. Salter SM, Karia A, Sanfilippo FM, Clifford RM. Effectiveness of e-learning in pharmacy education. Am J Pharm Educ. 2014;78(4):83. doi: 10.5688/ajpe78483. [PubMed: 24850945]. [PubMed Central: PMC4028592].
  • 21. Porter AL, Pitterle ME, Hayney MS. Comparison of online versus classroom delivery of an immunization elective course. Am J Pharm Educ. 2014;78(5):96. doi: 10.5688/ajpe78596. [PubMed: 24954936]. [PubMed Central: PMC4064496].
  • 22. Can MH. An investigation of teacher's use of e-learning in science olympiad in Russian schools. Procedia Social Behav Sci. 2015;191:241-9. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.484.
  • 23. Sinclair PM, Kable A, Levett-Jones T, Booth D. The effectiveness of Internet-based e-learning on clinician behaviour and patient outcomes: A systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2016;57:70-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.01.011. [PubMed: 27045566].
  • 24. Mahoney NR, Boland MV, Ramulu PY, Srikumaran D. Implementing an electronic learning management system for an ophthalmology residency program. BMC Med Educ. 2016;16(1):307. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0828-5. [PubMed: 27894285]. [PubMed Central: PMC5127081].
  • 25. Khor WS, Baker B, Amin K, Chan A, Patel K, Wong J. Augmented and virtual reality in surgery-the digital surgical environment: Applications, limitations and legal pitfalls. Ann Transl Med. 2016;4(23):454. doi: 10.21037/atm.2016.12.23. [PubMed: 28090510]. [PubMed Central: PMC5220044].
  • 26. Back DA, Behringer F, Haberstroh N, Ehlers JP, Sostmann K, Peters H. Learning management system and e-learning tools: An experience of medical students' usage and expectations. Int J Med Educ. 2016;7:267-73. doi: 10.5116/ijme.57a5.f0f5. [PubMed: 27544782]. [PubMed Central: PMC5018353].
  • 27. Park JY, Woo CH, Yoo JY. Effects of blended cardiopulmonary resuscitation and defibrillation e-learning on nursing students' self-efficacy, problem solving, and psychomotor skills. Comput Inform Nurs. 2016;34(6):272-80. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000227. [PubMed: 27046387].
  • 28. Alsabawy AY, Cater-Steel A, Soar J. Determinants of perceived usefulness of e-learning systems. Comput Human Behav. 2016;64:843-58. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.065.
  • 29. Kim KH. The potential application of virtual, augmented, and mixed reality in neurourology. Int Neurourol J. 2016;20(3):169-70. doi: 10.5213/inj.1620edi005. [PubMed: 27706003]. [PubMed Central: PMC5083821].
  • 30. Hamacher A, Kim SJ, Cho ST, Pardeshi S, Lee SH, Eun SJ, et al. Application of virtual, augmented, and mixed reality to urology. Int Neurourol J. 2016;20(3):172-81. doi: 10.5213/inj.1632714.357. [PubMed: 27706017]. [PubMed Central: PMC5083835].
  • 31. Lawn S, Zhi X, Morello A. An integrative review of e-learning in the delivery of self-management support training for health professionals. BMC Med Educ. 2017;17(1):183. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-1022-0. [PubMed: 29017521]. [PubMed Central: PMC5634849].
  • 32. Warriner DR, Bayley M, Shi Y, Lawford PV, Narracott A, Fenner J. Computer model for the cardiovascular system: Development of an e-learning tool for teaching of medical students. BMC Med Educ. 2017;17(1):220. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-1058-1. [PubMed: 29157229]. [PubMed Central: PMC5697416].
  • 33. Kim Y, Kim H, Kim YO. Virtual reality and augmented reality in plastic surgery: A review. Arch Plast Surg. 2017;44(3):179-87. doi: 10.5999/aps.2017.44.3.179. [PubMed: 28573091]. [PubMed Central: PMC5447526].
  • 34. Benyoucef Y, Lesport P, Chassagneux A. The emergent role of virtual reality in the treatment of neuropsychiatric disease. Front Neurosci. 2017;11:491. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00491. [PubMed: 28928630]. [PubMed Central: PMC5591848].
  • 35. Asiry MA. Dental students' perceptions of an online learning. Saudi Dent J. 2017;29(4):167-70. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2017.03.005. [PubMed: 29033527]. [PubMed Central: PMC5634796].
  • 36. Isaacs AN, Nisly S, Walton A. Student-generated e-learning for clinical education. Clin Teach. 2017;14(2):129-33. doi: 10.1111/tct.12526. [PubMed: 27091138].
  • 37. Amouzeshi Z, Amouzeshi A, Mohammadi Y, Kianfar S. Impacts of e-learning on the cognitive learning of senior nursing students concerning central venous catheter. Interdisciplin J Virtual Learn Med Sci. 2017;8(2). doi: 10.5812/ijvlms.59469.
  • 38. Ngan OMY, Tang TLH, Chan AKY, Chen DM, Tang MK. Blended learning in anatomy teaching for non-medical students: An innovative approach to the health professions education. Health Profession Educat. 2018;4(2):149-58. doi: 10.1016/j.hpe.2017.11.001.
  • 39. Mills SJ, Yanes MJ, Casebeer CM. Perceptions of distance learning among faculty of a college of education. Merlot J Online Learn Teach. 2009;5(1):19-28.
  • 40. Mediran. [Medical education innovations and reform in Iran, Deputy of the Ministry of Health and Medical Education, Islamic Republic of Iran]. Ministry Health Med Educat. 2015. Persian.
  • 41. Makhdoom N, Khoshhal KI, Algaidi S, Heissam K, Zolaly MA. ‘Blended learning’ as an effective teaching and learning strategy in clinical medicine: A comparative cross-sectional university-based study. J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2013;8(1):12-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2013.01.002.
  • 42. Liu Q, Peng W, Zhang F, Hu R, Li Y, Yan W. The effectiveness of blended learning in health professions: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(1). e2. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4807. [PubMed: 26729058]. [PubMed Central: PMC4717286].
  • 43. Nartker AJ, Stevens L, Shumays A, Kalowela M, Kisimbo D, Potter K. Increasing health worker capacity through distance learning: A comprehensive review of programmes in Tanzania. Hum Resour Health. 2010;8:30. doi: 10.1186/1478-4491-8-30. [PubMed: 21194417]. [PubMed Central: PMC3023774].
  • 44. Macharia JKN, Pelser TG. Key factors that influence the diffusion and infusion of information and communication technologies in Kenyan higher education. Stud High Educat. 2012;39(4):695-709. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2012.729033.
  • 45. Hardaker G, Johnson M, Singh G. The adoption and diffusion of e-learning in UK Universities. Campus-Wide Inf Sys. 2011;28(4):221-33. doi: 10.1108/10650741111162707.
  • 46. Zand A, Abbaszadeh HA, Abdolahifar MA, Ali Aghaee A, Amini A, Mastery Farahni R. Role of e-learning in teaching anatomical sciences. Anat Sci J. 2016;13(1):55-60.
  • 47. Zaraii Zavaraki E, Rezaei E. The impact of using e-portfolio on attitude, motivation and academic achievement of students in Khajeh Nasirddin Toosi University's e-learning center. Train Measurement. 2011.
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .
Readers' Comments