Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences

Published by: Kowsar

Comparing Students’ Academic Engagement Based on How Much They Use Social Networks in Learning English

Fakhri Zamani 1 and Behnam Talebi 1 , *
Authors Information
1 Department of Educational Sciences, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran
Article information
  • Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences: June 2018, 9 (2); e65552
  • Published Online: June 18, 2018
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: January 24, 2018
  • Revised: May 20, 2018
  • Accepted: May 29, 2018
  • DOI: 10.5812/ijvlms.65552

To Cite: Zamani F, Talebi B. Comparing Students’ Academic Engagement Based on How Much They Use Social Networks in Learning English, Interdiscip J Virtual Learn Med Sci. 2018 ; 9(2):e65552. doi: 10.5812/ijvlms.65552.

Copyright © 2018, Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ( which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited
1. Background
2. Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion and Conclusion
  • 1. Halle T, Hair E, Wandner L, McNamara M, Chien N. Predictors and Outcomes of Early vs. Later English Language Proficiency Among English Language Learners. Early Child Res Q. 2012;27(1):1-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2011.07.004. [PubMed: 22389551]. [PubMed Central: PMC3290413].
  • 2. Singh NK, Zhang S, Besmel P. Globalization and language policies of multilingual societies: some case studies of south east Asia. Revista Brasileira de Linguistica Aplicada. 2012;12(2):349-80. doi: 10.1590/s1984-63982012000200007.
  • 3. Ali Pour V, Bekan S, Moradi R. [Pathology and qualitative study of English language in the curriculum of secondary education based on the Vienna Schnet and Fantenay model]. Q J Educ Psychol. 2016;12(42):129-54. Persian. doi: 10.22054/jep.2016.7386.
  • 4. Behroozi M, Amozghar AYA. [Pathology of English language teaching curriculum from the viewpoints of teachers and secondary students]. N Approach Educ Manag. 2014;2(18):125-42. Persian.
  • 5. Barabadi E, Razmjoo SA. The emergence of different contradictions in English language teaching in first-year primary schools under the new curriculum (CLT). Language Skills Train J. 2016;3(84):41-64.
  • 6. Van de Belt TH, Engelen LJ, Berben SA, Teerenstra S, Samsom M, Schoonhoven L. Internet and social media for health-related information and communication in health care: preferences of the Dutch general population. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(10). e220. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2607. [PubMed: 24088272]. [PubMed Central: PMC3806385].
  • 7. Aresti-Bartolome N, Garcia-Zapirain B. Technologies as support tools for persons with autistic spectrum disorder: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014;11(8):7767-802. doi: 10.3390/ijerph110807767. [PubMed: 25093654]. [PubMed Central: PMC4143832].
  • 8. Khodayarifard M, Abedini Y. Health Problems of Adolescents and Youths. Tehran: Tehran University Publications; 2012.
  • 9. Valle A, Regueiro B, Nunez JC, Rodriguez S, Pineiro I, Rosario P. Academic Goals, Student Homework Engagement, and Academic Achievement in Elementary School. Front Psychol. 2016;7:463. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00463. [PubMed: 27065928]. [PubMed Central: PMC4814489].
  • 10. Zarei Z, Ghorbani H. [The Effect of Virtual Social Networks on Students]. English Learn Teach Learn Technol. 2015;1(3):23-36. Persian.
  • 11. Casuso-Holgado MJ, Cuesta-Vargas AI, Moreno-Morales N, Labajos-Manzanares MT, Baron-Lopez FJ, Vega-Cuesta M. The association between academic engagement and achievement in health sciences students. BMC Med Educ. 2013;13:33. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-13-33. [PubMed: 23446005]. [PubMed Central: PMC3599896].
  • 12. Tian Y, Bian Y, Han P, Gao F, Wang P. Class Collective Efficacy and Class Size as Moderators of the Relationship between Junior Middle School Students' Externalizing Behavior and Academic Engagement: A Multilevel Study. Front Psychol. 2017;8:1219. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01219. [PubMed: 28769851]. [PubMed Central: PMC5513925].
  • 13. Shernof DJ, Ruzek EA, Sannella AJ, Schorr RY, Sanchez-Wall L, Bressler DM. Student Engagement as a General Factor of Classroom Experience: Associations with Student Practices and Educational Outcomes in a University Gateway Course. Front Psychol. 2017;8:994. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00994. [PubMed: 28663733]. [PubMed Central: PMC5471299].
  • 14. Wang MT, Degol J. Staying Engaged: Knowledge and Research Needs in Student Engagement. Child Dev Perspect. 2014;8(3):137-43. doi: 10.1111/cdep.12073. [PubMed: 27087833]. [PubMed Central: PMC4833401].
  • 15. Wang J, Liu RD, Ding Y, Xu L, Liu Y, Zhen R. Teacher's Autonomy Support and Engagement in Math: Multiple Mediating Roles of Self-efficacy, Intrinsic Value, and Boredom. Front Psychol. 2017;8:1006. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01006. [PubMed: 28690560]. [PubMed Central: PMC5481391].
  • 16. Guthrie JT, Klauda SL. Effects of Classroom Practices on Reading Comprehension, Engagement, and Motivations for Adolescents. Read Res Q. 2014;49(4):387-416. [PubMed: 25506087]. [PubMed Central: PMC4264840].
  • 17. Bijari B, Javadinia SA, Erfanian M, Abedini MR, Abassi A. The Impact of Virtual Social Networks on Students’ Academic Achievement in Birjand University of Medical Sciences in East Iran. Proc Soc Behav Sci. 2013;83:103-6. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.020.
  • 18. Javadinia SA, Erfanian M, Abedini MR, Bijari B. The effects of social networks on academic achievement of students, a study in Birjand University of Medical Sciences. Iran J Med Educ. 2012;12(8):598-606.
  • 19. Kolluru S, Varughese JT. Structured academic discussions through an online education-specific platform to improve Pharm.D. students learning outcomes. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2017;9(2):230-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2016.11.022. [PubMed: 29233408].
  • 20. Diug B, Kendal E, Ilic D. Evaluating the use of twitter as a tool to increase engagement in medical education. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2016;29(3):223-30. doi: 10.4103/1357-6283.204216. [PubMed: 28406107].
  • 21. Gagnon K. Using twitter in health professional education: a case study. J Allied Health. 2015;44(1):25-33. [PubMed: 25743398].
  • 22. Kirschner PA, Karpinski AC. Facebook® and academic performance. Comput Human Behav. 2010;26(6):1237-45.
  • 23. Felisoni DD, Godoi AS. Cell phone usage and academic performance: An experiment. Comput Educ. 2018;117:175-87. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.10.006.
  • 24. Enrique Hinostroza J. New Challenges for ICT in Education Policies in Developing Countries: The Need to Account for the Widespread Use of ICT for Teaching and Learning Outside the School. In: Lubin IA, editor. ICT-Supported Innovations in Small Countries and Developing Regions: Perspectives and Recommendations for International Education. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018. p. 99-119.
  • 25. Islam S, Malik MI, Hussain S, Thursamy R, Shujahat M, Sajjad M. Motives of excessive Internet use and its impact on the academic performance of business students in Pakistan. J Substance Use. 2017;23(3):254-61. doi: 10.1080/14659891.2017.1388857.
  • 26. Samavi SAW, Javdan M, Ebrahimi K. Relationship between cognitive engagement, emotional engagement, behavioral engagement and academic self-efficacy with academic achievement. Third Millennium Conference and Human Sciences. Shiraz. 2015.
  • 27. Reeve J, Tseng CM. Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Contemp Educ Psychol. 2011;36(4):257-67. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.002.
  • 28. Hajializadeh K. Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the academic engagement questionnaire among high school students. Q Educ Measure. 2016;6(24):83-102.

Featured Image:

Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .
Readers' Comments