Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences

Published by: Kowsar

Ranking the Scientific-Technology Literacy Indexes of Students from the Viwepoint of Faculty Members

Ali Khaleghkhah 1 , * and Habibeh Najafi 2
Authors Information
1 Philosophy of Education; University of Ardabili Mohaghegh, Ardabil, Iran
2 Educational Administration, University of Ardabili Mohaghegh, Ardabil, Iran
Article information
  • Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences: September 2017, 8 (3); e63886
  • Published Online: September 27, 2017
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: July 10, 2017
  • Accepted: August 28, 2017
  • DOI: 10.5812/ijvlms.63886

To Cite: Khaleghkhah A, Najafi H. Ranking the Scientific-Technology Literacy Indexes of Students from the Viwepoint of Faculty Members, Interdiscip J Virtual Learn Med Sci. 2017 ; 8(3):e63886. doi: 10.5812/ijvlms.63886.

Abstract
Copyright © 2017, Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion and Conclusion
Acknowledgements
Footnote
References
  • 1. Friedman TL. The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. 2005;
  • 2. Mason R, Rennie F. E-learning and Social Networking Handbook Resources for Higher Education. 2008;
  • 3. Dragoş V, Mih V. Scientific Literacy in School. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2015; 209: 167-72[DOI]
  • 4. Miller J. Influence of Literacy on Language Development. 2006; : 661-5[DOI]
  • 5. National Research Council National science education standard. 1996;
  • 6. Udompong L, Wongwanich S. Diagnosis of the scientific literacy characteristics of primary students. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2014; 116(21): 5091-6[DOI]
  • 7. Fensham PJ. Literacy, Scientific. 2005; 2(1): 541-7[DOI]
  • 8. Parkinson J, Adendorff R. The use of popular science articles in teaching scientific literacy. Eng Specific Purpos. 2004; 23(4): 379-96[DOI]
  • 9. Cook SB, Druger M, Ploutz-Snyder LL. Scientific literacy and attitudes towards American space exploration among college undergraduates. Space Policy. 2011; 27(1): 48-52[DOI]
  • 10. Greenhow C, Gibbins T, Menzer MM. Re-thinking scientific literacy out-of-school: Arguing science issues in a niche Facebook application. Comput Human Behav. 2015; 53: 593-604[DOI]
  • 11. Wang HY, Stocker JF, Fu D. New concepts of science and medicine in science and technology studies and their relevance to science education. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2012; 28(2): 2-7[DOI]
  • 12. The national curriculum for England. 1999;
  • 13. Holbrook S. Innovations in local drug delivery for treating common oral conditions. Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2012; 114(3): 60-1
  • 14. Gao H, He W, Zhang C, Ren L. Building scientific literacy in China: achievements and prospects. Sci Bull. 2016; 61(11): 871-4[DOI]
  • 15. Allworth MB. Postgraduate distance education in sheep health veterinary education. Small Rumin Res. 2014; 118(1-3): 97-9[DOI]
  • 16. Gonzalez-Rodriguez D, Kostakis V. Information literacy and peer-to-peer infrastructures: An autopoietic perspective. Telematic Inf. 2015; 32(4): 586-93[DOI]
  • 17. Kim YJ. Catholic schooling and further education. Econ Lett. 2012; 114(3): 346-8[DOI]
  • 18. Mc Eneaney E H. The worldwide cachet of scientific literacy. Comp Educ Rev. 2003; 47(2): 217-37[DOI]
  • 19. Weiner SA. Institutionalizing information literacy. J Acad Librariansh. 2012; 38(5): 287-93[DOI]
  • 20. Cuban L. Teachers and machines: the classroom use of technology since. 1986;
  • 21. Parkinson J. Acquiring scientific literacy through content and genre: a theme-based language course for science students. Eng Specific Purpos. 2000; 19(4): 369-87[DOI]
  • 22. Nordmann A. Discovering the nanoscale. 2004;
  • 23. Shanahan MC. Information literacy skills of undergraduate medical radiation students. Radiography. 2007; 13(3): 187-96[DOI]
  • 24. Pupil - perceived difficulties in the contextual material of Nigerian integrated science - a case study of JOS LGA, plateau state. 14th annual conference proceedings of Stan. : 235-48
  • 25. Perry J, Green A, Harrison K. The impact of Masters education in manual and manipulative therapy and the 'knowledge acquisition model'. Man Ther. 2011; 16(3): 285-90[DOI][PubMed]
  • 26. Jarvis P. Adult education and lifelong learning. 2008;
  • 27. Moravcisk MJ. Science development: the building science in less developed countries. 1980; : 237-47
  • 28. Martin LMW. An emerging research framework for studying informal learning and schools. Sci Educ. 2004; 88-82[DOI]
  • 29. Jacobs HL. Information Literacy and Reflective Pedagogical Praxis. J Acad Librariansh. 2008; 34(3): 256-62[DOI]
  • 30. Lantz A, Brage C. Towards a learning society — exploring the challenge of applied information literacy through reality-based scenarios. Innov Teach Learn Inf Comput Sci. 2006; 5(1): 1-15[DOI]
  • 31. Council of Ministers of Education C. Canadian Protocol for Collaboration on School Curriculum. 1997;
  • 32. Rodríguez-Entrena M, Salazar-Ordóñez M. Influence of scientific–technical literacy on consumers’ behavioural intentions regarding new food. Appetite. 2013; 60: 193-202[DOI]
  • 33. Osborne J, Simon S, Collins S. Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. Int J Sci Educ. 2003; 25(9): 1049-79[DOI]
  • 34. Gunderson R. The sociology of technology before the turn to technology. Technol Soc. 2016; 47: 40-8[DOI]
  • 35. Starkey L. Evaluating learning in the 21st century: a digital age learning matrix. Technol Pedag Educ. 2011; 20(1): 19-39[DOI]
  • 36. Admiraal W, Louws M, Lockhorst D, Paas T, Buynsters M, Cviko A, et al. Teachers in school-based technology innovations: A typology of their beliefs on teaching and technology. Comput Educ. 2017; 114: 57-68[DOI]
  • 37. ITEA . Standards for technological literacy: Content for the study of technology. 2000;
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .
Readers' Comments