Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences

Published by: Kowsar

Investigation of Preferential Factors of Users of Online Learning Systems for Ease of Learning

Raziyeh Yousof Boroujerdi 1 , Mostafa Azizi 2 , Ali Asghar Hayat 3 , * and Meymanat Abedini Baltork 2
Authors Information
1 Department of Educational Management, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Education, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran
3 Clinical Education Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
Article information
  • Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences: March 2018, 9 (1); e61310
  • Published Online: March 7, 2018
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: September 23, 2017
  • Revised: February 14, 2018
  • Accepted: February 18, 2018
  • DOI: 10.5812/ijvlms.61310

To Cite: Yousof Boroujerdi R, Azizi M, Hayat A A, Abedini Baltork M. Investigation of Preferential Factors of Users of Online Learning Systems for Ease of Learning, Interdiscip J Virtual Learn Med Sci. 2018 ; 9(1):e61310. doi: 10.5812/ijvlms.61310.

Abstract
Copyright © 2018, Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited
1. Background
2. Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion and Conclusion
Acknowledgements
Footnotes
References
  • 1. Mahdioun R, Ghahremani M, Farasatkhah M, Abolghasemi M. Quality of learning in academic online learning centers, qualitative study [In Persian]. Bibliog Inf Res Bull Acad. 2011;44(58):77-100.
  • 2. Chrysostomou K, Chen SY, Liu X. Investigation of users’ preferences in interactive multimedia learning systems: a data mining approach. Interactive Learn Environ. 2009;17(2):151-63. doi: 10.1080/10494820801988315.
  • 3. Minetou CG, Chen SY, Liu X. Investigation of the use of navigation tools in web-based learning: A data mining approach. Int J Hum Comput Interact. 2008;24(1):48-67. doi: 10.1080/10447310701771480.
  • 4. Ramos de Melo F, Flôres EL, Diniz de Carvalho S, Gonçalves de Teixeira RA, Batista Loja LF, de Sousa Gomide R. Computational organization of didactic contents for personalized virtual learning environments. Comput Educ. 2014;79:126-37. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.07.012.
  • 5. Ozkan S, Koseler R. Multi-dimensional students’ evaluation of e-learning systems in the higher education context: An empirical investigation. Comput Educ. 2009;53(4):1285-96. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.011.
  • 6. Buff A. Enjoyment of learning and its personal antecedents: Testing the change–change assumption of the control-value theory of achievement emotions. Learn Individ Differ. 2014;31:21-9. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2013.12.007.
  • 7. Coll C, Rochera MJ, de Gispert I. Supporting online collaborative learning in small groups: Teacher feedback on learning content, academic task and social participation. Comput Educ. 2014;75:53-64. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.01.015.
  • 8. Pedaste M, Sarapuu T. Design principles for support in developing students’ transformative inquiry skills in Web-based learning environments. Interactive Learn Environ. 2012;22(3):309-25. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2011.654346.
  • 9. Schroeder A, Minocha S, Schneider C. The strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of using social software in higher and further education teaching and learning. J Comput Assist Learn. 2010;26(3):159-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00347.x.
  • 10. Lee S, Kim BG. Users' preferential factors in Web-based e-learning systems for ease of workplace learning in Korea. Learn Individ Differ. 2015;39:96-104. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2015.03.027.
  • 11. Yang JC, Chen SY. Investigation of learners' perceptions for video summarization and recommendation. Interactive Learn Environ. 2012;20(4):369-85. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2010.486888.
  • 12. Lim KH, O’Connor MJ, Remus WE. The impact of presentation media on decision making: does multimedia improve the effectiveness of feedback?. Inf Manage. 2005;42(2):305-16. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2003.12.012.
  • 13. Kazemi Mahyari H. Role and Importance of Feedback in Online learning, National Conference on Accounting and Management. Conferences Center of Power Research Center. Tehran. 2013.
  • 14. Andres HP. Multimedia, information complexity, and cognitive processing. Inf Resour Manag J. 2004;17(1):63-78. doi: 10.4018/irmj.2004010104.
  • 15. Mayer RE, Moreno R. Aids to computer-based multimedia learning. Learn Inst. 2002;12(1):107-19. doi: 10.1016/s0959-4752(01)00018-4.
  • 16. Khodadad Hoseiny SH, Noori A, Zabihi MR. E-learning acceptance in higher education: Application of flow theory, technology acceptance model & e-service quality. Q J Res Plann High Educ. 2013;19(1):111-36.
  • 17. Mahmoodi Z, Esmaelzadeh SS, Lotfi R, Baradaran Eftekhari M, Akbari Kamrani M, Mehdizadeh Tourzani Z, et al. The evaluation of a virtual education system based on the DeLone and McLean model:  A path analysis. F1000Res. 2017;6:1631. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.12278.1.
  • 18. Kising'u TM. "Role of Strategic Leadership for Sustainable Competitive Advantage in Kenyan Public and Private Universities". JKUAT-COHRED; 2017.
  • 19. Kahai SS, Cooper RB. Exploring the core concepts of media richness theory: The impact of cue multiplicity and feedback immediacy on decision quality. J Manag Inf Syst. 2014;20(1):263-99. doi: 10.1080/07421222.2003.11045754.
  • 20. Chen N, Wei C, Huang YC, Kinshuk . The integration of print and digital content for providing learners with constructive feedback using smartphones. Br J Educ Technol. 2013;44(5):837-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01371.x.
  • 21. Lai CL, Hwang GJ, Liang JC, Tsai CC. Differences between mobile learning environmental preferences of high school teachers and students in Taiwan: a structural equation model analysis. Educ Technol Res Dev. 2016;64(3):533-54. doi: 10.1007/s11423-016-9432-y.
  • 22. Bazm S. Assessment of E- Learning Providing Status in Yazd Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences [In Persian]. Biannual J Med Educ Dev Center. 2015;3(1):46-51.
  • 23. Karanjam SS, Zarif Sanaiey N, Karanjam S. Designing a comprehensive organizational e-learning model using the meta-synthesis method. Interdiscip J Virtual Learn Med Sci. 2017;8(3). doi: 10.5812/ijvlms.11496.

Featured Image:

Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments