Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences

Published by: Kowsar

Psychological and Job Factors Influencing the Intention to Use Information and Communication Technology Among Teachers

Mohammad Hassan Seif 1 , Soghra Zarei 2 , * , Saeed Talebi 1 and Ahmad Rastegar 1
Authors Information
1 Doctor of Educational Planning (Distance), Assistant Professor, Payame Noor University, Tehran, IR Iran
2 Master of Educational Research, Department of Education, Payame Noor University, Tehran, IR Iran
Article information
  • Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences: September 2015, 7 (3); e12175
  • Published Online: September 30, 2015
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: October 9, 2015
  • Revised: September 5, 2016
  • Accepted: September 30, 2016
  • DOI: 10.5812/ijvlms.12175

To Cite: Seif M H, Zarei S, Talebi S, Rastegar A. Psychological and Job Factors Influencing the Intention to Use Information and Communication Technology Among Teachers, Interdiscip J Virtual Learn Med Sci. 2015 ; 7(3):e12175. doi: 10.5812/ijvlms.12175.

Abstract
Copyright © 2015, Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Introduction
2. Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion and Conclusions
Acknowledgements
Footnotes
References
  • 1. Taghvayi S, Zahmatkesh N. Information Technology in Europe. 2005;
  • 2. Maleki S. IT in education. 2009;
  • 3. Ayati M, Rostami M. Using secondary and high school teachers of basic sciences of information and communication technology. Educ Technol. 2011; 6(2): 127-34
  • 4. Buntat Y, Saud MS, Dahar A, Arifin KS, Zaid YH. Computer technology application and vocational education: A review of literature and research. Eur J Soc Sci. 2010; 14(4): 645-51
  • 5. Md Yunus M. Malaysian ESL teachers’ use of ICT in their classrooms: expectations and realities. ReCALL. 2007; 19(1): 79[DOI]
  • 6. Davis FD. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Q. 1989; 13(3): 319[DOI]
  • 7. Alam SM. Evaluating the post-Intranet usage: empirical study in Malaysian port industry. Aust J Basic Appl Sci. 2011; 5(7): 336-45
  • 8. Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Manag Sci. 1989; 35(8): 982-1003[DOI]
  • 9. Klopping IM, McKinney E. Extending the technology acceptance model and the task-technology fit model to consumer e-commerce. Inf Technol Learn Performance J. 2004; 22(1): 35
  • 10. Goodhue DL, Thompson RL. Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance. MIS Q. 1995; 19(2): 213[DOI]
  • 11. Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. 1977;
  • 12. Goodhue DL. Understanding User Evaluations of Information Systems. Manag Sci. 1995; 41(12): 1827-44[DOI]
  • 13. Abbasi MS, Irani Z, Chandio FH. Determinants of social and institutional beliefs about internet acceptance within developing country’s context: A structural evaluation of higher education systems in Pakistan. 2010;
  • 14. Usoro A, Shoyelu S, Kuofie M. Task-technology fit and technology acceptance models applicability to e-tourism. J Econ Dev Manag IT Finance and Market. 2010; 2(1): 1
  • 15. Chao CM, Ma CM, Cheng BW. Integrating Technology Acceptance Model and Task-technology Fit into Blended E-learning System. J Appl Sci. 2013; 13(5): 736-42[DOI]
  • 16. Siang JJ, Santoso HB. Students'perspective of learning management system: An empirical evidence of technology acceptance model in emerging countries. Res World. 2015; 6(2): 1
  • 17. Ajjan H, Hartshorne R. Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests. Internet High Educ. 2008; 11(2): 71-80[DOI]
  • 18. Vatanasakdakul S, D'Ambra J, Ramburuth P. IT Doesn't Fit! The Influence of Culture on B2B in Thailand. J Glob Inf Technol Manag. 2014; 13(3): 10-38[DOI]
  • 19. Hsu CL, Lu HP. Why do people play on-line games? An extended TAM with social influences and flow experience. Inf Manag. 2004; 41(7): 853-68[DOI]
  • 20. Kim BG, Park SC, Lee KJ. A structural equation modeling of the Internet acceptance in Korea. Electron Commerce Res Applic. 2007; 6(4): 425-32[DOI]
  • 21. Sarmiento PMC. The Study on Behavioral Intention of Use towards a Clinical Decision Support Systems: A Casa in CNS La Paz- Bolivia. 2009;
  • 22. Andrews L, Drennan J, Tossan V, Cacho-Elizondo S. Using TAM to examine consumer acceptance of a mobile phone assisted smoking cessation program in Australia. 2010;
  • 23. Ozer G, Yilmaz E. Comparison of the theory of reasoned action and the theory of planned behavior: An application on accountants’ information technology usage. Afr J Business Manag. 2010; 5(1): 50-8
  • 24. Khorasani A, Abdul-Maleki J, Zahedi H. Factors affecting the adoption of e-learning in students of Tehran University of Medical Sciences Based on Technology Acceptance Model. Med Educ. 2011; 6(11): 664-73
  • 25. Macharia J, Nyakwende E. The Influence of E-mail on Students’ Learning in Higher Education: An Extension to the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Asian J Inf Technol. 2010; 9(3): 123-32[DOI]
  • 26. Mobile G-Portal supporting collaborative sharing and learning in geography fieldwork: an empirical study. Proceedings of the 7th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries. : 462-71
  • 27. Sharma SK, Chandel JK. Technology acceptance model for the use of learning through websites among students in Oman.
  • 28. Wu W, Chang HP, Guo CJ. An empirical assessment of science teachers' intentions toward technology integration. J Comput Math Sci Teach. 2008; 27(4): 499
  • 29. Yuen AHK, Ma WWK. Exploring teacher acceptance of e‐learning technology. Asia Pac J Teach Educ. 2008; 36(3): 229-43
  • 30. Kirmizi O. Measuring Technology Acceptance level of Turkish pre-service English teachers by using technology acceptance Model. Educ Res Rev. 2014; 9(23): 1323
  • 31. Khalifa M, Ning Shen K. Explaining the adoption of transactional B2C mobile commerce. J Enterprise Inf Manag. 2008; 21(2): 110-24[DOI]
  • 32. Thompson II T. Assessing the determinants of information technology adoption in Jamaica's public sector using the technology acceptance model. 2010;
  • 33. Tu TT, Chiu YH. Investigation of the factors influencing the acceptance of electronic cash stored-value cards. Afr J Business Manag. 2011; 5(1): 108
  • 34. Karaali D, Gumussoy CA, Calisir F. Factors affecting the intention to use a web-based learning system among blue-collar workers in the automotive industry. Comput Human Behav. 2011; 27(1): 343-54[DOI]
  • 35. Rose J, Fogarty G. Determinants of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in the technology acceptance model: senior consumers' adoption of self-service banking technologies. Acad World Business Market Manag Dev. 2006; 2(10): 122-9
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments