Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences

Published by: Kowsar

Multi-Dimensional Quality Evaluation Modelling of E-Learning Courses from Learners’ Perspective

Bahman Saeidi Pour 1 and Hanieh Shahsavari 2 , *
Authors Information
1 Assistant Professor, PhD of Educational Administration, Department of Educational Science, Tehran Payame Noor University
2 Department of Educational Science, Tehran Payame Noor University
Article information
  • Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences: September 2016, 7 (3); e12173
  • Published Online: September 30, 2016
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: September 15, 2015
  • Revised: September 2, 2016
  • Accepted: September 30, 2016
  • DOI: 10.5812/ijvlms.12173

To Cite: Saeidi Pour B, Shahsavari H. Multi-Dimensional Quality Evaluation Modelling of E-Learning Courses from Learners’ Perspective, Interdiscip J Virtual Learn Med Sci. 2016 ; 7(3):e12173. doi: 10.5812/ijvlms.12173.

Copyright © 2016, Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ( which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
  • 1. Berge ZL. Evaluation of web-based training programs. 2000;
  • 2. Ehlers U. Quality in e-learning from a learner's perspective. European J Open Distance Learning. 2004;
  • 3. Jung IS, Latchem C. Assuring quality in Asian open and distance learning. Open learning. 2007; 22(3): 235-50
  • 4. Meyer K. Quality in distance education: Focus on online learning. . ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report. 2002; 29(4)
  • 5. Stella A, Gnanam A. Quality assurance in distance education: The challenges to be addressed. Higher Educ. 2004; 47(2): 143-60
  • 6. Jung I. Quality assurance and continuous quality improvement in distance education. Inter Handbook Dist Educ. 2008; : 609-24
  • 7. Islas E, Perez M, Rodriguez G, Paredes I. E-learning tools evaluation and roadmap development for an electrical utility. J Theoretical Applied Elect Commerce Res. 2007; 2(1): 63
  • 8. Kyamansh AR. Methods of training evaluation (in Persian). 2002;
  • 9. Cyert RM, March JG. A behavioral theory of the firm. 1963; 2
  • 10. Bazargan A. Quality and it's evaluation in higher education: A look at national and international experiences (in Persian). Rahyaft Quarterly. 1997; 60: 15-71
  • 11. Bailey JE, Pearson SW. Development of a tool for measuring and analyzing computer user satisfaction. Manag Sci. 1983; 29(5): 530-45[DOI]
  • 12. Adam Mahmood MO, Burn JM, Gemoets LA, Jacquez C. Variables affecting information technology end-user satisfaction: a meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Inter J Human-Computer Studies. 2000; 52(4): 751-71[DOI]
  • 13. Moore JC. Elements of quality: The Sloan-C framework. 2002; : 34
  • 14. Momeni Rad A, Kh A. Quality assurance of e-learning by using electronic learning standards (in Persian). Educ Strategi Med Sci. 2010; 3(3): 87-92
  • 15. Lindgaard G, Dudek C. What is this evasive beast we call user satisfaction? Interacting with Computers. 2003; 15(3): 429-52[DOI]
  • 16. Ives B, Olson MH, Baroudi JJ. The measurement of user information satisfaction. Communications of the ACM. 1983; 26(10): 785-93[DOI]
  • 17. Doll WJ, Torkzadeh G. The measurement of end-user computing satisfaction. MIS Quarterly. 1988; 12(2): 259[DOI]
  • 18. Piccoli G, Ahmad R, Ives B. Web-based virtual learning environments: A research framework and a preliminary assessment of effectiveness in basic it skills training. MIS Quarter. 2001; 25(4): 401[DOI]
  • 19. Arbaugh JB. Virtual classroom characteristics and student satisfaction with internet-based MBA courses. J Manag Educ. 2000; 24(1): 32-54[DOI]
  • 20. Hong KS, Lai KW, Holton D. Students' satisfaction and perceived learning with a web-based course. Educ Technol Society. 2003; 6(1): 116-24
  • 21. Jung I. The dimensions of e-learning quality: from the learner’s perspective. Educa Technol Res Develop. 2010; 59(4): 445-64[DOI]
  • 22. Wang YS. Assessment of learner satisfaction with asynchronous electronic learning systems. Inform Manag. 2003; 41(1): 75-86[DOI]
  • 23. Arbaugh JB, Duray R. Technological and structural characteristics, student learning and satisfaction with web-based courses: An exploratory study of two on-line mba programs. Management Learn. 2002; 33(3): 331-47[DOI]
  • 24. Naidu S. E-learning: A guidebook of principles, procedures and practices: Commonwealth educational media centre for Asia (CEMCA). 2006; : 65-76
  • 25. Rovinskyi D, Synytsya K. Distance courses quality: a learner's view. 2004; : 1080-1[DOI]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:



Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments