Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences

Published by: Kowsar

Strategies to Improve Teaching-Learning Process in Smart Schools in Terms of Teaching Method

Ali Akbar Dolati 1 , * , Laleh Jamshidi 2 and Ali Akbar Amin Beidokhti 3
Authors Information
1 Faculty of Education and Psychology Semnan University
2 Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran
3 Associate Professor, Department of Educational Science, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran
Article information
  • Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences: March 2016, 7 (1); e12149
  • Published Online: March 30, 2016
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: September 27, 2015
  • Revised: March 24, 2016
  • Accepted: March 29, 2016
  • DOI: 10.5812/ijvlms.12149

To Cite: Dolati A A, Jamshidi L, Amin Beidokhti A A. Strategies to Improve Teaching-Learning Process in Smart Schools in Terms of Teaching Method, Interdiscip J Virtual Learn Med Sci. 2016 ; 7(1):e12149. doi: 10.5812/ijvlms.12149.

Abstract
Copyright © 2016, Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
References
  • 1. The integration of ICT in the teaching and learning processes: A study on smart school of Malaysia. Proceedings of the 5th WSEAS/IASME international conference on education technology.
  • 2. Markoe Hayes S, Chapple S, Ramirez C. Strong, smart and bold strategies for improving attendance and retention in an after-school intervention. J Adolesc Health. 2014; 54(3 Suppl)-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 3. Taleb Z, Hassanzadeh F. Toward smart school: A comparison between smart school and traditional school for mathematics learning. Proced Soc Behav Sci. 2015; 171: 90-5
  • 4. Sivagami A, Samundeeswari R. A Study on use of information communication technology in higher education in Thanjavur district. Inter J Manag. 2015; 6(1): 418-26
  • 5. Shafiepour Motlagh F, Elyasi F. Offering a Model to Evaluate Relation of Use of Laptops, Tablets and IPads to Effective Learning BasedUpon Mediation of Educational Motivation the case of teachers of smart high schools of Tehran. Inter Res J Applied Basic Sci. 2013;
  • 6. Breen R, Lindsay R, Jenkins A, Smith P. The role of information and communication technologies in a university learning environment. Studies Higher Educ. 2001; 26(1): 95-114
  • 7. Jung I. Ict-pedagogy integration in teacher training: Application cases worldwide. Educ Technol Soc. 2005; 8(2): 94-101
  • 8. Lorenzo AR, Lorenzo BU. Learning styles of teacher education students: Basis in improving the teaching-learning process. Procedia-Social Behav Sci. 2013; 103(595-605)
  • 9. Hadjerrouit S. Developing web-based learning resources in school education: a user-centered approach. Interdisciplinary J e-Skills Lifelong Learning. 2010;
  • 10. Al-Faki IM, Khamis AHA. Difficulties facing teachers in using interactive whiteboards in their classes. American Inter J Soc Sci. 2014; 3(2): 136-58
  • 11. Rahim Bahmani R, Keshavarz H, Ghajari H. The effect of smart schools on the social skills of students. Inter j contemp res Busi. 2013; 5(7): 151-9
  • 12. Soltani M. The structure of smart schools in the educational system. J Basic Applied Sci Res. 2012; 2(6): 6250-4
  • 13. Ashouri J, Kajbaf MB, Manshaei G, Talebi H. Effectiveness of conceptual map, cooperative learning and traditional teaching methods on the incentive to progress and academic achievement in biology course (in Persian). Curriculum Plan Knowled Res Educ Sci. 2014; 11(14): 63-73
  • 14. Abiri M, Sadeghi A, Gavid MK, Ofoghi N. A comparison of cooperative, discovery, and lecture method on students' learning development and outlook toward physics (in Persian). Res Curriculum Plan. 2014; 11(15): 55-67
  • 15. Karmi M. Affecting cooperative teaching method of grouping and student academic achievement in secondary school in mashhad city. Research Curriculum J. 2012; 2(33): 93-105
  • 16. Krause UM, Stark R, Mandl H. The effects of cooperative learning and feedback on e-learning in statistics. Learning and Instruction. 2009; 19(2): 158-70
  • 17. Ho FF, Boo HK. Cooperative learning: Exploring its effectiveness in the Physics classroom. 2007;
  • 18. Delasobera BE, Goodwin TL, Strehlow M, Gilbert G, D'Souza P, Alok A, et al. Evaluating the efficacy of simulators and multimedia for refreshing ACLS skills in India. Resuscitation. 2010; 81(2): 217-23[DOI][PubMed]
  • 19. Bloomfield J, Roberts J, While A. The effect of computer-assisted learning versus conventional teaching methods on the acquisition and retention of handwashing theory and skills in pre-qualification nursing students: a randomised controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud. 2010; 47(3): 287-94[DOI][PubMed]
  • 20. Senn GJ. Comparison of face-to-face and hybrid delivery of a course that requires technology skills development. J Inform Technol Educ. 2008; 7(20): 267-84
  • 21. Keong CC, Horani S, Daniel J. A study on the use of ICT in mathematics teaching. Malaysian Online J Inst Technol. 2005; 2(3): 43-51
  • 22. Richey RC, Silber K, Ely D. Reflections on the 2008 AECT definitions of the field. TechTrends. 2008; 52(1): 24-5
  • 23. Tanır, A. . German language teaching academicians' contentment on the usage of smart board. Procedia-Social Behav Sci. 2015; 182: 259-65
  • 24. Choi Y, Song E, Oh E. Effects of teaching communication skills using a video clip on a smart phone on communication competence and emotional intelligence in nursing students. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2015; 29(2): 90-5[DOI][PubMed]
  • 25. Miranda H, Russell M. Predictors of teacher-directed student use of technology in elementary classrooms: A multilevel SEM approach using data from the USEIT study. J Res Technol Educ. 2011; 43(4): 301-23
  • 26. Mayer RE. Multimedia learning: Cambridge university press. 2009;
  • 27. Deryakulu D, Buyukozturk S, Ozcınar, H. . Predictors of academic achievement of student ICT teachers with different learning styles. Anxiety. 2009; 8
  • 28. Barrow L, Markman L, Rouse CE. Technology's edge: The educational benefits of computer-aided instruction. Am Econ J. 2009; 1(1): 52-74
  • 29. Salimi L, Ghonoodi A. The study and comparison of curriculum in smart and traditional schools. Social Behav Sci. 2011; 15: 3059-62[DOI]
  • 30. Elliot S. Multimedia in schools: A study of web-based animation effectiveness. 2010;
  • 31. Gladun A, Rogushina J, Garcı´a-Sanchez F, Martínez-Bejar R, Fernández-Breis JT. An application of intelligent techniques and semantic web technologies in e-learning environments. Expert System App. 2009; 36(2): 1922-31[DOI]
  • 32. Pelgrum WJ. Obstacles to the integration of ICT in education: results from a worldwide educational assessment. Computer Educ. 2001; 37(2): 163-78[DOI]
  • 33. Hamzah M, Ismail A, Embi M. The impact of technology change in Malaysian smart schools on Islamic education teachers and students. Inter J Human Soc Sci. 2009; 4(11): 824-36
  • 34. Umar IN, Hassan ASA. Malaysian teachers’ levels of ict integration and its perceived impact on teaching and learning. Social Behav Sci. 2015; 197: 2015-21[DOI]
  • 35. Mohajeran B, Ghaleei A, Hamzehrobati M. The main reasons for the lack of correct formation of smart schools in mazandaran province and presenting solutions for their development (From the Viewpoints of ICT experts) (in Persian). Inter J Instruc Media. 2014; 4(2): 13-23
  • 36. Creswell JW. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 2013;
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments