Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences

Published by: Kowsar

Comparing the Fluidity, Recall Power, Achievement Motivation and Educational Attainment of Students in Smart and Ordinary Schools in Physics 1

Mostafa Ghane Ardekani 1 and Faezeh Nateghi 2 , *
Authors Information
1 Islamic Azad University of Arak, Arak, Iran
2 Department of Educational Sciences, Islamic Azad University of Arak, Arak, Iran
Article information
  • Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences: March 2016, 7 (1); e12141
  • Published Online: March 28, 2016
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: July 8, 2014
  • Revised: February 29, 2016
  • Accepted: March 9, 2016
  • DOI: 10.5812/ijvlms.12141

To Cite: Ghane Ardekani M, Nateghi F. Comparing the Fluidity, Recall Power, Achievement Motivation and Educational Attainment of Students in Smart and Ordinary Schools in Physics 1, Interdiscip J Virtual Learn Med Sci. 2016 ; 7(1):e12141. doi: 10.5812/ijvlms.12141.

Copyright © 2016, Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ( which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
  • 1. Timoe R. Online communication in school. J Edu Technol. 2005; 6(3): 137-55
  • 2. Jimoyiannis A, Komis V. Examining teachers' beliefs about ICT in education: Implications of a teacher preparation programme. Teacher development. 2007; 11(2): 149-73
  • 3. McFarlane A, Sakellariou S. The role of ICT in science education. Cambridge J Edu. 2002; 32(2): 219-32
  • 4. Whelan R. Use of ict in education in the south pacific: Findings of the pacific elearning observatory. Distance Education. 2008; 29(1): 53-70
  • 5. Zameni F, Kardan S. Influence application Information and communications technology in learning math (In Persian). J Infb Communicat Technol Edu Sci. 2007; 1(1): 33-8
  • 6. Hadjerrouit S. Developing web-based learning resources in school education: A user-centered approach. Interdisciplinary J E-Learning Learn Object. 2010; 6(13): 115-35
  • 7. Zoufan S. The use of new technologies in education (In Persian). 2011;
  • 8. Alias N, Siraj S, DeWitt D, Attaran M, Nordin AB. Evaluation on the usability of physics module in a secondary school in malaysia: Students' retrospective. Malaysian Online J Edu Technol. 2013; 44
  • 9. Barrow L, Markman L, Rouse CE. Technology's edge: The educational benefits of computer-aided instruction. Am Econ J. 2009; 1(1): 52-74[DOI]
  • 10. Deryakulu D, Buyukozturk S, Ozcinar H. Predictors of academic achievement of studen ICT teachers with different styles. Inter J Human Soc Sci. 2010; 5(9): 567-73
  • 11. Yosefi R, Khateari K, Lickdashti A. The effect simulation software on learning & remind students & comparisont with the traditional teaching methods (in Persian). ICT in education. 2011; 3(10): 2-5
  • 12. Mokhtari A. Study of design principles for educational virtual environment (in Persian). 2011;
  • 13. Elliot S. Multimedia in schools: A study of web-based animation effectiveness.
  • 14. Harrison C, Cavendish S, Comber C, Fisher T, Harrison A, Haw K. The impact of information and communication technologies on pupil learning and attainment. ICT in schools Research and evaluation. 2002;
  • 15. Sharefi A. Approaches and strategies ICT in universities. J Educ Admin. 2006; 6(5): 23-33
  • 16. Sharifi A, Imani MN. Identifications of skills required by high school teachers and students to apply ICT. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2013; 83: 841-5[DOI]
  • 17. Soleymanpoor J, Khalkhali A, Rayat Konandeh Falah L. The effect of ICT- based teaching methods in creating sustained learning in experimental science course in third grade secondary school students (in Persian). J Sci Res ICT Educ. 2010; 1(2): 77-93
  • 18. Fazelian P, Sadatmand M. Study the effect CAI in compare with traditional method in teaching English in first year in Tehran city high school (in Persian). Growth Teach Language. 2004; 5(12): 4-10
  • 19. Shobbir A, Ataran M. Taking advantage of educational software physics II High and its effect on academic achievement and engagement of students in the class (in Persian). 2006;
  • 20. Ahmady K. Compare teaching method discussion with use ICT & use not of that on learning & motivation achievement in mathematics course 1 first year high school students Arak district 2 (in Persian). 2011;
  • 21. Alhoseani M. investigation condition middle school & high school with notice to evaluate indicators in the academic year 2010-2011 (in Persian). 2011;
  • 22. Nosrat F, Yousefi A, Liaghatdar M. Impact technical active instruction physics on academic achievement high school students (in Persian). J Knowled Res Educ. 2010; 25: 53-64
  • 23. Bhin Iean N. Educational technology in process teaching-learning space geometry (in Persian). J Growth Mate. 2009; 97: 26-32
  • 24. Headari M, Vazeri M, Adli F. The study status of smart schools based on academic performance and standards and compare critical thinking students with school (in Persian). J Inform Commun Technol Edu. 2013; 2: 149-73
  • 25. Gall M, Borgh V, Gall J. Qualitative and quantitative research methods in psychology (in Persian). 2003;
  • 26. Abedi J. Creativity and new ways of measuring it (in Persian). J Psychol Res. 1996; 2(2): 18-25
  • 27. Hermans HJ. A questionnaire measure of achievement motivation. J Appl Psychol. 1970; 54(4): 353-63[PubMed]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:



Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments