Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences

Published by: Kowsar

Psychometric Properties of the Pedagogical Evaluation Scale of Synchronous Technologies in Distance Education

Masood Baratian 1 , * , Mehran Farajollahi 2 , Mohammad Reza Sarmadi 3 and Seyed Mehdi Mosakazemi 4
Authors Information
1 Ph.D. Candidate of Distance Education Planning, Payame Noor University, Tehran, IR Iran
2 Ph.D. of Curriculum Development, Faculty of Payame Noor University, Tehran, IR Iran
3 Ph.D. of Education Philosophy, Faculty of Payame Noor University, Tehran, IR Iran
4 Ph.D. of Geography, Faculty of Payame Noor University, Tehran, IR Iran
Article information
  • Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences: March 2016, 7 (1); e12075
  • Published Online: March 31, 2016
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: July 21, 2015
  • Revised: March 23, 2016
  • Accepted: March 26, 2016
  • DOI: 10.5812/ijvlms.12075

To Cite: Baratian M, Farajollahi M, Sarmadi M R, Mosakazemi S M. Psychometric Properties of the Pedagogical Evaluation Scale of Synchronous Technologies in Distance Education, Interdiscip J Virtual Learn Med Sci. 2016 ; 7(1):e12075. doi: 10.5812/ijvlms.12075.

Abstract
Copyright © 2016, Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Introduction
2. Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion and Conclusion
Acknowledgements
Footnotes
References
  • 1. Driscoll MP, Driscoll MP. Psychology of learning for instruction. Needham Heights. 2005; 14(2): 115-35
  • 2. Mishra S. A design framework for online learning environments. Br J Educ Technol. 2002; 33(4): 493-6[DOI]
  • 3. Zaharias P, Vasslopoulou K, Poulymenakou A. Designing on-line learning courses: Implications for usability. Sci J Appl Inf Technol. 2002; 1(1)
  • 4. Huang HM. Toward constructivism for adult learners in online learning environments. Br J Educ Technol. 2002; 33(1): 27-37[DOI]
  • 5. Pasha Sharifi H. Evaluation of internal and external motivations and the students' attitudes of different academic levels to educational issues and the contribution of these variables in explaining of their academic achievement. Sci Res J Educ Innov. 2006; 18(9): 114-52
  • 6. Bonk CJ, Reynolds TH. Learner-centered Web instruction for higher-order thinking, teamwork, and apprenticeship. Web Based Instruct. 1997; 8(11): 167-78
  • 7. Tavakoli A, Kianoosh D, Zarei R. Evaluation of Effective Factors in Designing the Distance Learning Model in Iran's Higher Education's and Presentation of an Appropriate Model.arches. J Basic Appl Sci Res. 2012; 2(8): 8169-76
  • 8. NCES issues report on distance education. College Res Lib N. 1997; 7(58): 689-68
  • 9. Rourke L, Anderson T, Garrison DR, Archer W. Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. Int J E-Learn Distance Educ. 2007; 14(2): 50-71
  • 10. Simonson M, Smaldino S, Albright M, Zvacek S. Teaching and learning at a distance. 2014;
  • 11. Jiang M. A study of factors influencing students’ perceived learning in a web-based course environment. Int J Educ Telecommun. 2000; 6(4): 317-38
  • 12. Ward M, Newlands D. Use of the Web in undergraduate teaching. Comput Educ. 1998; 31(2): 171-84[DOI]
  • 13. Harasim LM. Learning networks: A field guide to teaching and learning online. 1995;
  • 14. Matthews D. The origins of distance education and its use in the United States. J Technol Horizons Educ. 1999; 27(2): 54
  • 15. Swan K, Shea P, Fredericksen E, Pickett A, Pelz W, Maher G. Building Knowledge Building Communities: Consistency, Contact and Communication in the Virtual Classroom. J Educ Comput Res. 2000; 23(4): 359-83[DOI]
  • 16. Jiang M. Distance learning in a Web-based environment: An analysis of factors influencing students' perceptions of online learning. 1998;
  • 17. Harasim LM. Online education: Perspectives on a new environment. 1990;
  • 18. Berge ZL. Computer conferencing and the on-line classroom. Int J Educ Telecommun. 1997; 3(1): 3-21
  • 19. Umoru-Onuka AO. An evaluative study of students' perception of the problem, prospect, and viability of distance education in Nigeria. J Adult Non-Formal Educ. 2002;
  • 20. Jarmon L, Traphagan T, Mayrath M, Trivedi A. Virtual world teaching, experiential learning, and assessment: An interdisciplinary communication course in Second Life. Comput Educ. 2009; 53(1): 169-82[DOI]
  • 21. Windschitl M. The WWW and Classroom Research: What Path Should We Take? Educ Res. 1998; 27(1): 28[DOI]
  • 22. Eachus P, Cassidy S. Development of the web users self-efficacy scale (WUSE). Issues Inf Sci Inf Technol J. 2006; 3: 199-209
  • 23. Bostock SJ. Constructivism in Mass Higher Education: a Case Study. Br J Educ Technol. 1998; 29(3): 225-40[DOI]
  • 24. Chou SW, Liu CH. Learning effectiveness in a Web-based virtual learning environment: a learner control perspective. J Comput Assist Learn. 2005; 21(1): 65-76[DOI]
  • 25. Vygotsky LS. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. 1980;
  • 26. Parker CD. A descriptive study to identify deterrents to participation in employer-provided e-learning. 2004;
  • 27. Bruner JS. Toward a theory of instruction. 1966;
  • 28. Jonassen DH. Transforming learning with technology: Beyond modernism and post-modernism or whoever controls the technology creates the reality. Educ Technol. 2000; 40(2): 21-5
  • 29. Synergizing technology with cognition and pedagogy: A framework for designing elearning programs. National conference of the Philippine e-learning Society. : 1-2
  • 30. Alausa DWS. Impact of information technology in modern distance education in Engineering. Int J Res Educ. 2006; 3(2): 306-12
  • 31. King C, Fricker B. Multimodal curriculum delivery in distance education. Int J E-Learn Distance Educ. 2007; 17(2): 102-11
  • 32. Meyen EL, Aust RJ, Bui YN, Ramp E, Smith SJ. The Online Academy formative evaluation approach to evaluating online instruction. Internet High Educ. 2002; 5(2): 89-108[DOI]
  • 33. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS, Osterlind SJ. Using multivariate statistics. 2001;
  • 34. Anderson T, Liam R, Garrison DR, Archer W. Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. 2001;
  • 35. Lessiter J, Freeman J, Keogh E, Davidoff J. A Cross-Media Presence Questionnaire: The ITC-Sense of Presence Inventory. Presence Teleoperat Virtual Environ. 2001; 10(3): 282-97[DOI]
  • 36. Rovai AP. Development of an instrument to measure classroom community. Internet High Educ. 2002; 5(3): 197-211[DOI]
  • 37. Biocca F, Harms C, Burgoon JK. Toward a More Robust Theory and Measure of Social Presence: Review and Suggested Criteria. Presence Teleoperat Virtual Environ. 2003; 12(5): 456-80[DOI]
  • 38. Devi P. An ICT-Based Distance Education Model: an Evaluation of ICT-Based Modes at the University of the South Pacific. 2006;
  • 39. Arbaugh JB. Does the Community of Inquiry Framework Predict Outcomes in Online MBA Courses? Int Rev Res Open Distribut Learn. 2008; 9(2)[DOI]
  • 40. Swan K, Shea P, Richardson J, Ice P, Garrison DR, Cleveland-Innes M, et al. Validating a measurement tool of presence in online communities of inquiry. E-Mentor. 2008; 2(24): 1-12
  • 41. Bangert AW. Building a validity argument for the community of inquiry survey instrument. Internet High Educ. 2009; 12(2): 104-11[DOI]
  • 42. Shea P, Bidjerano T. Community of inquiry as a theoretical framework to foster “epistemic engagement” and “cognitive presence” in online education. Comput Educ. 2009; 52(3): 543-53[DOI]
  • 43. Dillon CL, Walsh SM. Faculty: The neglected resource in distance education. Am J Distance Educ. 1992; 6(3): 5-21[DOI]
  • 44. Shepherd MM, Martz B, Ferguson J, Klein G. A survey of distance education programs. Educational Innovation in Economics and Business IX . 2004;
  • 45. Arbaugh JB. Virtual Classroom versus Physical Classroom: An Exploratory Study of Class Discussion Patterns and Student Learning in an Asynchronous Internet-Based MBA Course. J Manag Educ. 2000; 24(2): 213-33[DOI]
  • 46. Beebe SA. The Competent Group Communicator: Assessing Essential Competencies of Small Group Problem Solving. 1995;
  • 47. Yoo Y, Alavi M. Media and Group Cohesion: Relative Influences on Social Presence, Task Participation, and Group Consensus. MIS Q. 2001; 25(3): 371[DOI]
  • 48. Cassidy S, Eachus P. Developing the Computer User Self-Efficacy (Cuse) Scale: Investigating the Relationship between Computer Self-Efficacy, Gender and Experience with Computers. J Educ Comput Res. 2002; 26(2): 133-53[DOI]
  • 49. Barbeite FG, Weiss EM. Computer self-efficacy and anxiety scales for an Internet sample: testing measurement equivalence of existing measures and development of new scales. Comput Human Behav. 2004; 20(1): 1-15[DOI]
  • 50. Shroff RH, Vogel DR, Coombes J. Assessing individual-level factors supporting student intrinsic motivation in online discussions: A qualitative study. J Inf Systems Educ. 2008; 19(1): 111
  • 51. Jonassen DH, Carr C, Yueh HP. Computers as mindtools for engaging learners in critical thinking. Tech Trends. 1998; 43(2): 24-32[DOI]
  • 52. Jones G, Knezek G. Categorizing distance learning systems: discovering successful ingredients. World Conference on Computers in Education VI. 1995;
  • 53. Carr-Chellman A, Duchastel P. The ideal online course. Br J Educ Technol. 2000; 31(3): 229-41[DOI]
  • 54. Riccomini P. The Comparative Effectiveness of Two Forms of Feedback: Web-Based Model Comparison and Instructor Delivered Corrective Feedback. J Educ Comput Res. 2002; 27(3): 213-28[DOI]
  • 55. Zarif Sanayei N. Presenting the perceptive model for effective distance learning in higher education. 2010;
  • 56. Alavi M. Computer-Mediated Collaborative Learning: An Empirical Evaluation. MIS Q. 1994; 18(2): 159[DOI]
  • 57. Hiltz SR. The virtual classroom: Learning without limits via computer networks. 1994;
  • 58. Martz B, Reddy VK, Sangermano K. Looking for indicators of success for distance education. Distance learning and university effectiveness: Changing educational paradigms for online learning. 2004;
  • 59. Hazari S, North A, Moreland D. Investigating pedagogical value of wiki technology. J Inf Systems Educ. 2009; 20(2): 187
  • 60. Parameswaran M, Whinston AB. Social computing: An overview. Commun Assoc Inf Systems. 2007; 19(1): 37
  • 61. Mishra P, Koehler MJ. Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teach College Record. 2006; 108(6): 1017-54[DOI]
  • 62. Elgort I, Smith AG, Toland J. Is wiki an effective platform for group course work? Aust J Educ Technol. 2008; 24(2)
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments