Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences

Published by: Kowsar

Drawing Up a Medical Syllabus by Integrating the Gamified Blended Module of L2 English Learning

Saeed Khazaie 1 , * and Hossein Vahid Dastjerdi 2
Authors Information
1 PhD in TEFL, English Department, Faculty of Letters and Humanities, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Khuzestan, IR Iran
2 Associate Professor of Applied Linguistics, English Department, Faculty of Foreign Languages, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, IR Iran
Article information
  • Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences: December 2015, 6 (4); e11993
  • Published Online: December 31, 2015
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: July 21, 2015
  • Revised: November 30, 2015
  • Accepted: December 24, 2015
  • DOI: 10.5812/ijvlms.11993

To Cite: Khazaie S, Vahid Dastjerdi H. Drawing Up a Medical Syllabus by Integrating the Gamified Blended Module of L2 English Learning, Interdiscip J Virtual Learn Med Sci. 2015 ; 6(4):e11993. doi: 10.5812/ijvlms.11993.

Abstract
Copyright © 2015, Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Introduction
2. Methods
3. Results
4. Conclusions
Footnotes
References
  • 1. Willis J. A flexible framework for task-based learning. 1996;
  • 2. Richards JC. Communicative language teaching today. 2005;
  • 3. Kramsch CJ, McConnell-Ginet S, Ginet-McConnell S. Text and context: Cross-disciplinary perspectives on language study. 1992;
  • 4. Hubbard P, Levy M. Amsterdam. 2006; [DOI]
  • 5. Stansbury M. 10 Things to ask when choosing ed tech for young children. Technol News Innov K-12 Educ. 2014; 17(4): 16
  • 6. Ryan T. Congressman Tim Ryan introduces the academic, social, and emotional learning Act. 2013;
  • 7. Vocate DR. Intrapersonal communication: Different voices, different minds. 1994;
  • 8. Frawley W, Lantolf JP. Second Language Discourse: A Vygotskyan Perspective. Appl Linguistics. 1985; 6(1): 19-44[DOI]
  • 9. Eseryel D, Law V, Ifenthaler D, Ge X, Miller R. An investigation of the interrelationships between motivation, engagement, and complex problem solving in game-based learning. Educ Technol Soc. 2014; 17(1): 42-53
  • 10. Warschauer M. Comparing face-to-face and electronic discussion in the second language classroom. CALICO J. 1995; : 7-26
  • 11. Czepielewski S. Learning a language in virtual worlds: A review of innovation and ICT in language teaching methodology. 2011; : 15-24
  • 12. Stenstrom AB. An introduction to spoken interaction. 2014;
  • 13. Cutting J. Pragmatics and discourse: A resource book for students. 2005;
  • 14. Everson BJ. Vygotsky and the Teaching of Writing. CSWQ. 1991; 13(3): 8-11
  • 15. Calfee R. Handbook of research on teaching literacy through the communicative and visual arts. 2005; : 144-66
  • 16. Al Kaboody M. Second language motivation; the role of teachers in learners’ motivation. J Acad Appl Stud. 2013; 3(4): 45-54
  • 17. Chang LYH. Characteristics of Motivated L2 Class Groups: From Language Teachers’ and Students’ Perspectives. English Language Teach. 2014; 7(7): 159
  • 18. Zarei AA, Gilani MS. L2 vocabulary learning through collaborative techniques. Int J Language Learn Appl Linguistics World. 2013; 4(1): 71-84
  • 19. Paige RM, Jorstad J, Siaya L, Klein F, Colby J. Culture as the core: integrating culture into the language education. 2003; : 173-236
  • 20. Del Valle R, Oncu S, Koksal NF, Kim N, Alford P, Duffy TM. Effects of online cognitive facilitation on student learning. The 27th Annual Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology. 2004; : 808-18
  • 21. Kauchak D, Eggen P. Introduction to teaching: Becoming a professional. 2016;
  • 22. Post R, Rathet L. Using student native culture as content in the EFL classroom. English Teaching Forum. 1996; 34(3): 12
  • 23. Swain M, Lapkin S. Interaction and Second Language Learning: Two Adolescent French Immersion Students Working Together. Modern Language J. 1998; 82(3): 320-37[DOI]
  • 24. Gorjian B, Moosavinia SR, Ebrahimi Kavari K, Asgari P, Hydarei A. The impact of asynchronous computer-assisted language learning approaches on English as a foreign language high and low achievers' vocabulary retention and recall. Comput Assisted Language Learn. 2011; 24(5): 383-91[DOI]
  • 25. Mühleisen S. The cultural politics of English as a world language. 2003; : 107-18
  • 26. Wells G. The complementary contributions of Halliday and Vygotsky to a “language-based theory of learning”. Linguist Educ. 1994; 6(1): 41-90[DOI]
  • 27. Schmitt N. Vocabulary in language teaching. 2000;
  • 28. Nation ISP. Learning vocabulary in another language. 2001;
  • 29. Pazio M. Blended learning and its potential in expanding vocabulary knowledge: A case study. Teach English Technol. 2010; 10(1): 3-30
  • 30. Pierce D. How to move people in the digital age. Technol News Innov K-12 Educ. 2014; 17(4): 20
  • 31. Dziuban CD, Hartman JL, Moskal PD. Blended learning. Educause Center Appl Res Bull. 2004; 7(1): 12
  • 32. Neuman SB. Handbook of research on teaching literacy through the communicative and visual arts. 2005; : 15-22
  • 33. Yashima T. Willingness to communicate in a second language: The Japanese EFL context. Modern Language J. 2002; 86(1): 54-66
  • 34. Insixiengmay M. How to support young learners with tablets. 2005;
  • 35. Golato P, VanPatten B. From Input to Output: A Teacher's Guide to Second Language Acquisition. 2004;
  • 36. Thompson K. Technology, literacy and learning: A multimodal approach. 2006; 2
  • 37. Johnson AP. Teaching reading and writing: A guidebook for tutoring and remediating students. 2008;
  • 38. Swales J. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. 1990;
  • 39. Chen NS, Hsieh SW, Kinshuk A. Effects of short-term memory and content representation type on mobile language learning. Language Learn Technol. 2008; 12(3): 93-113
  • 40. Birjandi P, Anani Sarab MR, Samimi D. English (1) and (2) for pre-university students. 2012;
  • 41. McCarter S. Medicine 1. 2009;
  • 42. McCarter S. Medicine 2 . 2010;
  • 43. Khazaie S, Mashhadi A. An investigation into the effect of students' cognitive load and creativity on the blended module of L2 learning. Seventh Conference on E-learning in Medical Education. 2014;
  • 44. Havashki H, Towhidi H. English Games [software]. 2013;
  • 45. Rezvanfar MA, Rezvanfar MA, Ahmadi A, Saadi HA, Baeeri M, Abdollahi M. Mechanistic links between oxidative/nitrosative stress and tumor necrosis factor alpha in letrozole-induced murine polycystic ovary: biochemical and pathological evidences for beneficial effect of pioglitazone. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2012; 31(9): 887-97[DOI][PubMed]
  • 46. Al-Seghayer K. The effect of multimedia annotation modes on L2 vocabulary acquisition. Language Learn Technol. 2001; 5(1): 202-32
  • 47. Boller S. Interview with mobile learning thought leader Mayra Aixa Villar. 2013;
  • 48. Hayati A, Jalilifar A, Mashhadi A. Using Short Message Service (SMS) to teach English idioms to EFL students. Br J Educ Technol. 2013; 44(1): 66-81[DOI]
  • 49. Ellis R. The study of second language acquisition. 2008;
  • 50. Dornyei Z. Teaching and researching motivation. 2001;
  • 51. MacIntyre PD, Gardner RC. Methods and results in the study of anxiety and language learning: A review of the literature. Language Learn. 1991; 41(1): 85-117
  • 52. Vygotsky LS. Thought and language (rev. ed.) 1986;
  • 53. Wieczorek JA. The Concept of “French” in Foreign Language Texts. Foreign Language Ann. 1994; 27(4): 487-97[DOI]
  • 54. Hudson RA. Sociolinguistics. 1996; [DOI]
  • 55. Robson G. Individual learner differences and classroom participation: A pilot study. 1992;
  • 56. Nagamine T. Exploring Preservice Teachers''Beliefs: What Does it Mean to Become an English Teacher in Japan? 2008;
  • 57. Giles H, Tania Giles O. Explaining communication: Contemporary theories and exemplars. 2005; : 293-310
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments