Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences

Published by: Kowsar

A Thematic Analysis of the Conceptual Framework of E-Learning in Higher Education

Mona Ghoreishi 1 , Mohammad Ali Nadi 2 , * , Gholamreza Manshee 3 and Narges Saeedian 4
Authors Information
1 Educational Psychology, Department of Educational Psychology, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
2 Educational Science, Management, Department of Educational Science, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
3 Psychology, Department of Educational Psychology, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
4 Educational Management, Department of Management, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
Article information
  • Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences: March 2017, 8 (1); e11498
  • Published Online: March 26, 2017
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: March 17, 2017
  • Accepted: March 24, 2017
  • DOI: 10.5812/ijvlms.11498

To Cite: Ghoreishi M, Nadi M A, Manshee G, Saeedian N. A Thematic Analysis of the Conceptual Framework of E-Learning in Higher Education, Interdiscip J Virtual Learn Med Sci. 2017 ; 8(1):e11498. doi: 10.5812/ijvlms.11498.

Abstract
Copyright © 2017, Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion and Conclusion
Acknowledgements
Footnotes
References
  • 1. Lim H, Lee S, Nam K. Validating E-learning factors affecting training effectiveness. Int J Info Manag. 2007; 27(1): 22-35[DOI]
  • 2. Clark RC, Mayer RE. E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. 2016; [DOI]
  • 3. Chu H, Liao M, Chen T, Lin C, Chen Y. Learning case adaptation for problem-oriented e-learning on mathematics teaching for students with mild disabilities. Expert Syst Appl. 2011; 38(3): 1269-81[DOI]
  • 4. Alavi M, Leidner DE. Research commentary: Technology-mediated learning—a call for greater depth and breadth of research. Info Syst Res. 2001; 12(1): 1-10[DOI]
  • 5. Masoumi D, Lindstrom B. Foundations of cultural design in e-learning. Int J Internet Ent Manage. 2009; 6(2): 124-42[DOI]
  • 6. Wang Y. Assessment of learner satisfaction with asynchronous electronic learning systems. Info Manage. 2003; 41(1): 75-86[DOI]
  • 7. Johnson RD, Hornik S, Salas E. An empirical examination of factors contributing to the creation of successful e-learning environments. Int J Hum Comput Stud. 2008; 66(5): 356-69[DOI]
  • 8. Evaluating virtual curriculum in computer engineering [In Persian]. Proceedings of second international conference on E-learning. : 12-23
  • 9. Odunaike S, Olugbara O, Ojo S. E-learning implementation critical success factors. innovation. 2013; 3(4)
  • 10. Frimpon MF. A re-structuring of the critical success factors for e-learning deployment. Am Int J Contemp Rese. 2012; 2(3): 115-27
  • 11. Bhuasiri W, Xaymoungkhoun O, Zo H, Rho JJ, Ciganek AP. Critical success factors for e-learning in developing countries: A comparative analysis between ICT experts and faculty. Comput Educ. 2012; 58(2): 843-55[DOI]
  • 12. Li Q, Lau RWH, Wah BW, Ashman H, Leung EWC, Li F, et al. Guest editors' introduction: Emerging internet technologies for e-learning. IEEE Int Comput. 2009; 13(4): 11-7[DOI]
  • 13. United States Distance Learning Association . USDLA best practices in distance learning programming for online distance learning. 2009;
  • 14. North American Council for Online Learning (NACOL) . National standards of quality for online courses. 2008;
  • 15. Illinois Online Network (ION) University of Illinois . A Tool to Assist in the Design Redesign.And /or Evaluation of Online Courses. 2007;
  • 16. Ehlers U, Pawlowski JM. Handbook on quality and standardisation in e-learning. 2006; [DOI]
  • 17. Selim HM. Critical success factors for e-learning acceptance: Confirmatory factor models. Comput Educ. 2007; 49(2): 396-413[DOI]
  • 18. Fresen JW. Quality assurance practice in online (web-supported) learning in higher education: An exploratory study: 2005;
  • 19. Khan B. Managing e-learning: Design, delivery, implementation, and evaluation. 2005; [DOI]
  • 20. Baghery Majd R, Seyed Abbas M, Alizadeh Y, Shahi S. Survey and design pedagogical model in virtual higher education system [In Persian]. J InfoCommun Technol Educ. 2013; 4(3): 127-44
  • 21. Anarinejad A, Mohammadi M. The practical indicators for evaluation of e-learning in higher education in Iran [In Persian]. Interdiscip J Virtual Learn Med Sci (IJVLMS). 2014; 5(1): 11-25
  • 22. Rostami Nejad MA, Mozini N, Delavar A, Norozi D. Validation of a tool for predicting Iranian engineering student success in e-Learning, Iranian [In Persian]. Journal of Engineering. 2013; 15(57): 113-32
  • 23. Rastgarpour H, Georgizade S. Assessing the effectiveness of e-learning courses at Tarbiat Modarres University from the perspective of users [In Persian]. Quar J Info Commun Technol Educ Sci. 2012; 2(3): 5-30
  • 24. Masoumi D. E-learning in Iran: A breakthrough to ICT-based initiatives in an educational system. 2010; : 229-51
  • 25. Elahi S, Kanaani F, Shayan A. Designing a framework for effective factors on virtual students' tendency to the electronic learning and its assessment [In Persian]. Quart J Res Plann Higher Educ. 2011; 17(2): 59-80
  • 26. Key factors for the success of deployment of e-learning in educational institutions [In Persian]. International Conference on e-learning and Technology. : 1-7
  • 27. A survey of the attitude of students in agricultural extension and education to e-learning. Proceedings of Second International Conference on E-learning [In Persian]. : 64-9
  • 28. Validating and monitoring e-learning courses in Iran [In Persian]. Second Conference on E-learning Zahedan. : 215-27
  • 29. Jafari P, Saeidian N. A Study of pedagogical aspects of virtual university in order to present appropriate model [In Persian]. JSR. 2007; 1(12): 1-26
  • 30. Holloway I, Todres L. The status of method: Flexibility, consistency and coherence. Qual Res. 2003; 3(3): 345-57[DOI]
  • 31. Boyatzis RE. Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. 1998;
  • 32. Ryan GW, Bernard HR. Handbook of qualitative research. 2000;
  • 33. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006; 3(2): 77-101[DOI]
  • 34. King N, Horrocks C. Interviews in qualitative research. 2010;
  • 35. Pituch KA, Lee Y. The influence of system characteristics on e-learning use. Comput Educ. 2006; 47(2): 222-44[DOI]
  • 36. Hong K. Relationships between students' and instructional variables with satisfaction and learning from a Web-based course. Int Higher Educ. 2002; 5(3): 267-81[DOI]
  • 37. Thurmond VA, Wambach K, Connors HR, Frey BB. Evaluation of student satisfaction: Determining the impact of a web-based environment by controlling for student characteristics. Am J Dist Educ. 2002; 16(3): 169-90[DOI]
  • 38. Liaw S, Huang H, Chen G. Surveying instructor and learner attitudes toward e-learning. Comput Educ. 2007; 49(4): 1066-80[DOI]
  • 39. Zamapour A, Mirzabeygi MA. Investigating the factors affecting academic performance of e-learning learner in higher education and providing a successful model based on the learner's perspective [In Persian]. J Curriculum Stud. 2010; 4(16): 164-30
  • 40. Masoumi D, Lindström B. E-learning as a cultural artifact: Anempirical study of Iranian Virtual Institutions. Paper presented at the CulturalAttitudes Towards Technology and Communication Conference (CATAC 2012),Arhus, Danmark. 2012;
  • 41. Nichols AJ. An empirical assessment of attitude toward computers, motivation, perceived satisfaction from the e-learning system, and previous academic performance and their contribution to persistence of college student athletes enrolled in e-learning courses 2008;
  • 42. Sánchez-Franco MJ, Martínez-López FJ, Martín-Velicia FA. Exploring the impact of individualism and uncertainty avoidance in Web-based electronic learning: An empirical analysis in European higher education. Comput Educ. 2009; 52(3): 588-98[DOI]
  • 43. Slade SE. Employer provided optional e-training: Employing Gilbert's Behavioral Engineering Model in analyzing environmental and individual factors impacting participation [PhD Thesis] 2008;
  • 44. Schecter B. Design and evaluation of museum websites for adolescents; A developmental approach. 2005; : 24-32
  • 45. Lee J, Hong NL, Ling NL. An analysis of students' preparation for the virtual learning environment. Int Higher Educ. 2001; 4(3-4): 231-42[DOI]
  • 46. Ribble MS, Bailey GD. Web design and maintenanceApproach: A Rubric for creating Educational Websites . 2006;
  • 47. Porter LR. Developing an online curriculum: Technologies and techniques:. 2004;
  • 48. Moallem M. An interactive online course: A collaborative design model. Educ Technol Res Dev. 2003; 51(4): 85-103[DOI]
  • 49. Hansen MM. Versatile, immersive, creative and dynamic virtual 3-D healthcare learning environments: a review of the literature. J Med Internet Res. 2008; 10(3)[DOI][PubMed]
  • 50. Ibrahimzadeh I, Zandi B, Alipour A, Zare H, Yazdani F. The kinds of e-learning and different forms of interaction on it [In Persion]. Interdiscip J Virtual Learn Med Sci. 2010; 1(1): 11-22
  • 51. Grayson DR, Anderson T. E-learning in the 21st century: (theoretical and practical) [In Persian]. 2003;
  • 52. Moallem M. Accommodating individual differences in the design of online learning environments. J Res Technol Educ. 2007; 40(2): 217-45[DOI]
  • 53. Pettenati MC, Cigognini E, Mangione J, Guerin E. Using social software for personal knowledge management in formal online learning. Turkish Online J Dist Educ. 2007; 8(3)
  • 54. Govindasamy T. Successful implementation of e-Learning. Int Higher Educ. 2001; 4(3-4): 287-99[DOI]
  • 55. Benson Soong MH, Chuan Chan H, Chai Chua , Fong Loh K. Critical success factors for on-line course resources. Comput Educ. 2001; 36(2): 101-20[DOI]
  • 56. Sfard A. On Two Metaphors for Learning and the Dangers of Choosing Just One. Educl Res. 1998; 27(2): 4-13[DOI]
  • 57. Reeves TC, Reeves PM. Web-based instruction. 1997; : 59-66
  • 58. Henderson L. Instructional design of interactive multimedia: A cultural critique. Educ Technol Res Dev. 1996; 44(4): 85-104[DOI]
  • 59. Masoumi D, Masoumi B. Cultural and educational infrastructures in the design and implementation of e-learning environments [In Persian]. J Manage Plann Educ Sys. 2014; 6(10): 27-47
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments