Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences

Published by: Kowsar

A Thematic Analysis of the Conceptual Framework of E-Learning in Higher Education

Mona Ghoreishi 1 , Mohammad Ali Nadi 2 , * , Gholamreza Manshee 3 and Narges Saeedian 4
Authors Information
1 Educational Psychology, Department of Educational Psychology, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
2 Educational Science, Management, Department of Educational Science, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
3 Psychology, Department of Educational Psychology, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
4 Educational Management, Department of Management, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
Article information
  • Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences: March 2017, 8 (1); e11498
  • Published Online: March 26, 2017
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: March 17, 2017
  • Accepted: March 24, 2017
  • DOI: 10.5812/ijvlms.11498

To Cite: Ghoreishi M, Nadi M A, Manshee G, Saeedian N. A Thematic Analysis of the Conceptual Framework of E-Learning in Higher Education, Interdiscip J Virtual Learn Med Sci. 2017 ; 8(1):e11498. doi: 10.5812/ijvlms.11498.

Copyright © 2017, Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ( which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion and Conclusion
  • 1. Lim H, Lee S, Nam K. Validating E-learning factors affecting training effectiveness. Int J Info Manag. 2007; 27(1): 22-35[DOI]
  • 2. Clark RC, Mayer RE. E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. 2016; [DOI]
  • 3. Chu H, Liao M, Chen T, Lin C, Chen Y. Learning case adaptation for problem-oriented e-learning on mathematics teaching for students with mild disabilities. Expert Syst Appl. 2011; 38(3): 1269-81[DOI]
  • 4. Alavi M, Leidner DE. Research commentary: Technology-mediated learning—a call for greater depth and breadth of research. Info Syst Res. 2001; 12(1): 1-10[DOI]
  • 5. Masoumi D, Lindstrom B. Foundations of cultural design in e-learning. Int J Internet Ent Manage. 2009; 6(2): 124-42[DOI]
  • 6. Wang Y. Assessment of learner satisfaction with asynchronous electronic learning systems. Info Manage. 2003; 41(1): 75-86[DOI]
  • 7. Johnson RD, Hornik S, Salas E. An empirical examination of factors contributing to the creation of successful e-learning environments. Int J Hum Comput Stud. 2008; 66(5): 356-69[DOI]
  • 8. Evaluating virtual curriculum in computer engineering [In Persian]. Proceedings of second international conference on E-learning. : 12-23
  • 9. Odunaike S, Olugbara O, Ojo S. E-learning implementation critical success factors. innovation. 2013; 3(4)
  • 10. Frimpon MF. A re-structuring of the critical success factors for e-learning deployment. Am Int J Contemp Rese. 2012; 2(3): 115-27
  • 11. Bhuasiri W, Xaymoungkhoun O, Zo H, Rho JJ, Ciganek AP. Critical success factors for e-learning in developing countries: A comparative analysis between ICT experts and faculty. Comput Educ. 2012; 58(2): 843-55[DOI]
  • 12. Li Q, Lau RWH, Wah BW, Ashman H, Leung EWC, Li F, et al. Guest editors' introduction: Emerging internet technologies for e-learning. IEEE Int Comput. 2009; 13(4): 11-7[DOI]
  • 13. United States Distance Learning Association . USDLA best practices in distance learning programming for online distance learning. 2009;
  • 14. North American Council for Online Learning (NACOL) . National standards of quality for online courses. 2008;
  • 15. Illinois Online Network (ION) University of Illinois . A Tool to Assist in the Design Redesign.And /or Evaluation of Online Courses. 2007;
  • 16. Ehlers U, Pawlowski JM. Handbook on quality and standardisation in e-learning. 2006; [DOI]
  • 17. Selim HM. Critical success factors for e-learning acceptance: Confirmatory factor models. Comput Educ. 2007; 49(2): 396-413[DOI]
  • 18. Fresen JW. Quality assurance practice in online (web-supported) learning in higher education: An exploratory study: 2005;
  • 19. Khan B. Managing e-learning: Design, delivery, implementation, and evaluation. 2005; [DOI]
  • 20. Baghery Majd R, Seyed Abbas M, Alizadeh Y, Shahi S. Survey and design pedagogical model in virtual higher education system [In Persian]. J InfoCommun Technol Educ. 2013; 4(3): 127-44
  • 21. Anarinejad A, Mohammadi M. The practical indicators for evaluation of e-learning in higher education in Iran [In Persian]. Interdiscip J Virtual Learn Med Sci (IJVLMS). 2014; 5(1): 11-25
  • 22. Rostami Nejad MA, Mozini N, Delavar A, Norozi D. Validation of a tool for predicting Iranian engineering student success in e-Learning, Iranian [In Persian]. Journal of Engineering. 2013; 15(57): 113-32
  • 23. Rastgarpour H, Georgizade S. Assessing the effectiveness of e-learning courses at Tarbiat Modarres University from the perspective of users [In Persian]. Quar J Info Commun Technol Educ Sci. 2012; 2(3): 5-30
  • 24. Masoumi D. E-learning in Iran: A breakthrough to ICT-based initiatives in an educational system. 2010; : 229-51
  • 25. Elahi S, Kanaani F, Shayan A. Designing a framework for effective factors on virtual students' tendency to the electronic learning and its assessment [In Persian]. Quart J Res Plann Higher Educ. 2011; 17(2): 59-80
  • 26. Key factors for the success of deployment of e-learning in educational institutions [In Persian]. International Conference on e-learning and Technology. : 1-7
  • 27. A survey of the attitude of students in agricultural extension and education to e-learning. Proceedings of Second International Conference on E-learning [In Persian]. : 64-9
  • 28. Validating and monitoring e-learning courses in Iran [In Persian]. Second Conference on E-learning Zahedan. : 215-27
  • 29. Jafari P, Saeidian N. A Study of pedagogical aspects of virtual university in order to present appropriate model [In Persian]. JSR. 2007; 1(12): 1-26
  • 30. Holloway I, Todres L. The status of method: Flexibility, consistency and coherence. Qual Res. 2003; 3(3): 345-57[DOI]
  • 31. Boyatzis RE. Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. 1998;
  • 32. Ryan GW, Bernard HR. Handbook of qualitative research. 2000;
  • 33. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006; 3(2): 77-101[DOI]
  • 34. King N, Horrocks C. Interviews in qualitative research. 2010;
  • 35. Pituch KA, Lee Y. The influence of system characteristics on e-learning use. Comput Educ. 2006; 47(2): 222-44[DOI]
  • 36. Hong K. Relationships between students' and instructional variables with satisfaction and learning from a Web-based course. Int Higher Educ. 2002; 5(3): 267-81[DOI]
  • 37. Thurmond VA, Wambach K, Connors HR, Frey BB. Evaluation of student satisfaction: Determining the impact of a web-based environment by controlling for student characteristics. Am J Dist Educ. 2002; 16(3): 169-90[DOI]
  • 38. Liaw S, Huang H, Chen G. Surveying instructor and learner attitudes toward e-learning. Comput Educ. 2007; 49(4): 1066-80[DOI]
  • 39. Zamapour A, Mirzabeygi MA. Investigating the factors affecting academic performance of e-learning learner in higher education and providing a successful model based on the learner's perspective [In Persian]. J Curriculum Stud. 2010; 4(16): 164-30
  • 40. Masoumi D, Lindström B. E-learning as a cultural artifact: Anempirical study of Iranian Virtual Institutions. Paper presented at the CulturalAttitudes Towards Technology and Communication Conference (CATAC 2012),Arhus, Danmark. 2012;
  • 41. Nichols AJ. An empirical assessment of attitude toward computers, motivation, perceived satisfaction from the e-learning system, and previous academic performance and their contribution to persistence of college student athletes enrolled in e-learning courses 2008;
  • 42. Sánchez-Franco MJ, Martínez-López FJ, Martín-Velicia FA. Exploring the impact of individualism and uncertainty avoidance in Web-based electronic learning: An empirical analysis in European higher education. Comput Educ. 2009; 52(3): 588-98[DOI]
  • 43. Slade SE. Employer provided optional e-training: Employing Gilbert's Behavioral Engineering Model in analyzing environmental and individual factors impacting participation [PhD Thesis] 2008;
  • 44. Schecter B. Design and evaluation of museum websites for adolescents; A developmental approach. 2005; : 24-32
  • 45. Lee J, Hong NL, Ling NL. An analysis of students' preparation for the virtual learning environment. Int Higher Educ. 2001; 4(3-4): 231-42[DOI]
  • 46. Ribble MS, Bailey GD. Web design and maintenanceApproach: A Rubric for creating Educational Websites . 2006;
  • 47. Porter LR. Developing an online curriculum: Technologies and techniques:. 2004;
  • 48. Moallem M. An interactive online course: A collaborative design model. Educ Technol Res Dev. 2003; 51(4): 85-103[DOI]
  • 49. Hansen MM. Versatile, immersive, creative and dynamic virtual 3-D healthcare learning environments: a review of the literature. J Med Internet Res. 2008; 10(3)[DOI][PubMed]
  • 50. Ibrahimzadeh I, Zandi B, Alipour A, Zare H, Yazdani F. The kinds of e-learning and different forms of interaction on it [In Persion]. Interdiscip J Virtual Learn Med Sci. 2010; 1(1): 11-22
  • 51. Grayson DR, Anderson T. E-learning in the 21st century: (theoretical and practical) [In Persian]. 2003;
  • 52. Moallem M. Accommodating individual differences in the design of online learning environments. J Res Technol Educ. 2007; 40(2): 217-45[DOI]
  • 53. Pettenati MC, Cigognini E, Mangione J, Guerin E. Using social software for personal knowledge management in formal online learning. Turkish Online J Dist Educ. 2007; 8(3)
  • 54. Govindasamy T. Successful implementation of e-Learning. Int Higher Educ. 2001; 4(3-4): 287-99[DOI]
  • 55. Benson Soong MH, Chuan Chan H, Chai Chua , Fong Loh K. Critical success factors for on-line course resources. Comput Educ. 2001; 36(2): 101-20[DOI]
  • 56. Sfard A. On Two Metaphors for Learning and the Dangers of Choosing Just One. Educl Res. 1998; 27(2): 4-13[DOI]
  • 57. Reeves TC, Reeves PM. Web-based instruction. 1997; : 59-66
  • 58. Henderson L. Instructional design of interactive multimedia: A cultural critique. Educ Technol Res Dev. 1996; 44(4): 85-104[DOI]
  • 59. Masoumi D, Masoumi B. Cultural and educational infrastructures in the design and implementation of e-learning environments [In Persian]. J Manage Plann Educ Sys. 2014; 6(10): 27-47
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:



Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments