Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences

Published by: Kowsar

The Analysis of the Factors Affecting the Acceptance of E-learning in Higher Education

Mahdi Mahmodi 1 , *
Author Information
1 Educational Sciences and Psychology Department, Payam Noor University, Tehran, Iran
Article information
  • Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences: March 2017, 8 (1); e11158
  • Published Online: March 26, 2017
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: February 25, 2017
  • Accepted: February 26, 2017
  • DOI: 10.5812/ijvlms.11158

To Cite: Mahmodi M. The Analysis of the Factors Affecting the Acceptance of E-learning in Higher Education, Interdiscip J Virtual Learn Med Sci. 2017 ;8(1):e11158. doi: 10.5812/ijvlms.11158.

Abstract
Copyright © 2017, Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion and Conclusions
Footnote
References
  • 1. Li N, Kirkup G. Gender and cultural differences in Internet use: A study of China and the UK. Comput Educ. 2007; 48(2): 301-17[DOI]
  • 2. Tarhini A, Hone K, Liu X. Factors Affecting Students’ Acceptance of e-Learning Environments in Developing Countries:A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Intl J Inf Educ Technol. 2013; : 54-9[DOI]
  • 3. Clark P, Mayer R. E-learning and the science of instruction. 2011;
  • 4. Masrom M. Technology acceptance model and e-learning. Technology. 2007; 21(24): 81
  • 5. Benekli M, Anderson B, Wentling D, Bernstein S, Czuczman M, McCarthy P. Severe respiratory depression after dimethylsulphoxide-containing autologous stem cell infusion in a patient with AL amyloidosis. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2000; 25(12): 1299-301[DOI][PubMed]
  • 6. Al-alak BA, Alnawas IAM. Measuring the acceptance and adoption of e-learning by academic staff. Knowledge Manag E-Learn Int J. 2011; 3(2): 201-21
  • 7. Hung H, Cho V. Continued usage of e-learning communication tools: a study from the learners' perspective in Hong Kong. Int J Train Dev. 2008; 12(3): 171-87[DOI]
  • 8. Liaw SS, Huang HM, Chen GD. An activity-theoretical approach to investigate learners’ factors toward e-learning systems. Comput Human Behav. 2007; 23(4): 1906-20[DOI]
  • 9. Hammer M, Champy J. Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution. 2001;
  • 10. Lee MKO, Cheung CMK, Chen Z. Acceptance of Internet-based learning medium: the role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. Inf Manag. 2005; 42(8): 1095-104[DOI]
  • 11. Saade RG, Nebebe F, Tan W. Viability of the'Technology Acceptance Model' in Multimedia Learning Environments: A Comparative Study. Interdisciplinar J Knowledge Learn Objects. 2007; 3(1): 175-84
  • 12. Borstorff PC, Lowe SK. Student perceptions and opinions toward e-learning in the college environment. Acad Educ Leadersh J. 2007; 11(2): 13
  • 13. Zuvic-Butorac M, Roncevic N, Nemcanin D, Nebic Z. Blended e-learning in higher education: Research on students’ perspective. Issues Inform Sci Inf Technol. 2011; 8: 409-29
  • 14. Lopez-Fernandez O, Rodriguez-Illera JL. Investigating university students’ adaptation to a digital learner course portfolio. Comput Educ. 2009; 52(3): 608-16[DOI]
  • 15. Park SY. An analysis of the technology acceptance model in understanding university students' behavioral intention to use e-learning. Educ Technol Soc. 2009; 12(3): 150-62
  • 16. Ajzen I, Fishbein M. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour. 1980;
  • 17. Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. 1977;
  • 18. Lule I, Omwansa TK, Waema TM. Application of technology acceptance model (TAM) in m-banking adoption in Kenya. Int J Comput ICT Res. 2012; 6(1): 31-43
  • 19. Lau SH, Woods PC. An investigation of user perceptions and attitudes towards learning objects. Br J Educ Technol. 2008; 39(4): 685-99[DOI]
  • 20. Chau PYK, Hu PJH. Investigating healthcare professionals’ decisions to accept telemedicine technology: an empirical test of competing theories. Inf Manag. 2002; 39(4): 297-311[DOI]
  • 21. Huang L. The impact of cultural values on email acceptance: Evidence from the PRC. 2003;
  • 22. Sanayei A, Salimian H. The analysis of effecting factors on virtual education acceptance with emphasis on internal factors. Technol Educ. 2013; 7(4): 261-70
  • 23. Gu JC, Lee SC, Suh YH. Determinants of behavioral intention to mobile banking. Expert Systems Applicat. 2009; 36(9): 11605-16[DOI]
  • 24. Kripanont N. Examining a technology acceptance model of internet usage by academics within Thai business schools. 2007;
  • 25. Delone WH, McLean ER. The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. J Managinf Systems. 2003; 19(4): 9-30
  • 26. Venkatesh V, Bala H. Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions. Decision Sci. 2008; 39(2): 273-315[DOI]
  • 27. Venkatesh V, Davis FD. A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Manag Sci. 2000; 46(2): 186-204[DOI]
  • 28. Kim KK, Shin HK, Kim B. The role of psychological traits and social factors in using new mobile communication services. Electron Commerce Res Applicat. 2011; 10(4): 408-17[DOI]
  • 29. Amoako-Gyampah K. Perceived usefulness, user involvement and behavioral intention: an empirical study of ERP implementation. Comput Human Behav. 2007; 23(3): 1232-48[DOI]
  • 30. Cheney T. An Acceptance Model for Useful and Fun Information Systems. Human Technol Interdisciplinar J Humans ICT Environ. 2006; 2(2): 225-35[DOI]
  • 31. Kim HW, Chan HC, Gupta S. Value-based Adoption of Mobile Internet: An empirical investigation. Decision Support Systems. 2007; 43(1): 111-26[DOI]
  • 32. Chang SC, Tung FC. An empirical investigation of students' behavioural intentions to use the online learning course websites. Br J Educ Technol. 2008; 39(1): 71-83
  • 33. Brophy J. Research Linking Teacher Behavior to Student Achievement: Potential Implications for Instruction of Chapter 1 Students. Educ Psychol. 1988; 23(3): 235-86[DOI]
  • 34. Aixia D, Wang D. Factors influencing learner attitudes toward e-learning and development of e-learning environment based on the integrated e-learning platform. Int J E-Educ e-Business, E-Manag E-Learn. 2011; 1(3): 264
  • 35. Schillewaert N, Langerak F, Duhamel T. Non-probability sampling for WWW surveys: a comparison of methods. Int J Market Res. 1998; 40(4): 307
  • 36. Rhema A, Miliszewska I. Analysis of student attitudes towards e-learning: The case of engineering students in Libya. Issues Inform Sci Inf Technol. 2014; 11: 169-90
  • 37. Acceptance of e-learning among distance learners: A Malaysian perspective. Ascilite Conference.
  • 38. Selim HM. An empirical investigation of student acceptance of course websites. Comput Educ. 2003; 40(4): 343-60[DOI]
  • 39. Salari MM, Yaghmaei F, Mehdizade S, Vafadar Z, Afzali M. Factors related to accept of" e-learning" in nursing students. Educ Strateg Med Sci. 2009; 2(3): 103-8
  • 40. Al-Adwan A, Al-Adwan A, Smedley J. Exploring students acceptance of e-learning using Technology Acceptance Model in Jordanian universities. Int J Educ Dev Inf Commun Technol. 2013; 9(2): 4
  • 41. Woodrow L. College English writing affect: Self-efficacy and anxiety. System. 2011; 39(4): 510-22[DOI]
  • 42. Lee YH, Hsieh YC, Hsu CN. Adding innovation diffusion theory to the technology acceptance model: Supporting employees' intentions to use e-learning systems. Educ Technol Soc. 2011; 14(4): 124-37
  • 43. Schaik P, Teo T. Understanding Technology Acceptance in Pre-Service Teachers: A Structural-Equation Modeling Approach. 2013;
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .
Readers' Comments