Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences

Published by: Kowsar

Design, Implementation and Evaluation of Proposal Writing Module Through Blended and Face to Face Learning Methods

Maryam Tarashchin 1 , Rita Rezaee 2 , * and Nahid Zarif Sanaiey 3
Authors Information
1 Comprehensive Center of Excellence for Electronic Learning, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, IR Iran
2 Quality Improvement in Clinical Education Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, IR Iran
3 Department of E-learning, Virtual School, Center of Excellence for e-Learning in Medical Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, IR Iran
Article information
  • Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences: December 2016, 7 (4); e10835
  • Published Online: December 26, 2016
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: October 29, 2016
  • Accepted: December 20, 2016
  • DOI: 10.5812/ijvlms.10835

To Cite: Tarashchin M, Rezaee R, Zarif Sanaiey N. Design, Implementation and Evaluation of Proposal Writing Module Through Blended and Face to Face Learning Methods, Interdiscip J Virtual Learn Med Sci. 2016 ; 7(4):e10835. doi: 10.5812/ijvlms.10835.

Abstract
Copyright © 2016, Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion and Conclusion
Footnotes
References
  • 1. de Jong N, Savin-Baden M, Cunningham AM, Verstegen DM. Blended learning in health education: three case studies. Perspect Med Educ. 2014; 3(4): 278-88[DOI][PubMed]
  • 2. Hainey K, Kelly LJ, Green A. A blended learning approach to teaching CVAD care and maintenance. Br J Nurs. 2017; 26(2)[DOI][PubMed]
  • 3. Atkins S, Yan W, Meragia E, Mahomed H, Rosales-Klintz S, Skinner D, et al. Student experiences of participating in five collaborative blended learning courses in Africa and Asia: a survey. Glob Health Action. 2016; 9(1): 28145[DOI][PubMed]
  • 4. Prescott WJ, Woodruff A, Prescott GM, Albanese N, Bernhardi C, Doloresco F. Introduction and Assessment of a Blended-Learning Model to Teach Patient Assessment in a Doctor of Pharmacy Program. Am J Pharm Educ. 2016; 80(10): 176[DOI][PubMed]
  • 5. Garrison DR, Vaughan ND. Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. 2008;
  • 6. Baglien VG. Implementation of blended instruction: A case study of secondary family and consumer sciences 2009;
  • 7. Current position and role of blended learning in medical education [In Persian]. Proceedings of the 2nd Conference of E-Learning in Medical Education.
  • 8. Zolfaqari M, Sarmadi M, Negarandeh R, Zandi B, Ahmadi F. Studying the satisfaction of Nursing and Midwifery students and teachers from applying blended learning system [In Persian]. Iran J Nurs Res. 2010; 3(10-11): 99-109
  • 9. Bliuc AG. Blended/hybrid learning.
  • 10. Jahedi A, Mesbah A. The effect of face-to-face and blended education of general prerequisite courses on post-requisite courses for technical students [In Persian]. Mag Elearn Dist Acad . 2015; 5(4): 62-72
  • 11. Saeedinejat S, Vafaeenajar A. The effect of e-learning on students' educational success [In Persian]. Iran J Med Educ. 2011; 11(1): 1-9
  • 12. Catalano H. The Opportunity of Blended-learning Training Programs in Adult Education - Ascertaining Study. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2014; 142: 762-8[DOI]
  • 13. Köse U. A blended learning model supported with Web 2.0 technologies. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2010; 2(2): 2794-802[DOI]
  • 14. Ramazani SM. The effect of multimedia vs. Lecture-based education on educational achievement motivation (intrinsic and extrinsic) in Arabic course in tehran virtual schools [In Persian]. Educ Psychol. 2011; 7(21): 119
  • 15. Jafari M. Comparison of lecture and blended teaching methods on learning and satisfaction of medical students in biochemistry course [In Persian]. Iran J Med Educ. 2012; 12(7): 488-97
  • 16. Suda KJ, Sterling JM, Guirguis AB, Mathur SK. Student perception and academic performance after implementation of a blended learning approach to a drug information and literature evaluation course. Curr Phar Teach Learn. 2014; 6(3): 367-72[DOI]
  • 17. Owston R, York D, Murtha S. Student perceptions and achievement in a university blended learning strategic initiative. Internet High Educ . 2013; 18: 38-46[DOI]
  • 18. Karamizadeh Z, Zarifsanayei N, Faghihi AA, Mohammadi H, Habibi M. The study of effectiveness of blended learning approach for medical training courses. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2012; 14(1): 41-4[PubMed]
  • 19. Zarif Sanaiey N. The comparative study of the effectiveness of using e-learning, blended learning and presence learning in continuous medical education. World J Med Sci. 2014; 10(4): 488-93
  • 20. Güzer B, Caner H. The past, present and future of blended learning: an in depth analysis of literature. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2014; 116: 4596-603
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments