Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences

Published by: Kowsar

Investigating the Effect of Organizational Innovative Climate on Continuous Use of Electronic Teaching with the Role of Computer Self-Efficacy Among Male Teachers

Mahdi Moeinikia 1 , Adel Zahed-Babelan 1 , * , Seyyedmohammad Seyyedkalan 2 and Ghafar Karimianpur 2
Authors Information
1 Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Mohaghegh Ardabili University, Ardabil, IR Iran
2 Mohaghegh Ardabili University, Ardabil, IR Iran
Article information
  • Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences: December 2016, 7 (4); e10170
  • Published Online: December 28, 2016
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: October 31, 2016
  • Accepted: December 21, 2016
  • DOI: 10.5812/ijvlms.10170

To Cite: Moeinikia M, Zahed-Babelan A, Seyyedkalan S, Karimianpur G. Investigating the Effect of Organizational Innovative Climate on Continuous Use of Electronic Teaching with the Role of Computer Self-Efficacy Among Male Teachers, Interdiscip J Virtual Learn Med Sci. 2016 ; 7(4):e10170. doi: 10.5812/ijvlms.10170.

Abstract
Copyright © 2016, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion and Conclusion
Acknowledgements
Footnotes
References
  • 1. Zolfaghari M, Sarmadi M, Negarandeh R, Zandi B, Ahmadi F. Attitudes of Nursing and Midwifery School's Faculty toward blended E-learning at Tehran University of medical sciences (In Persian). J Hayat. 2009; 15(1): 31-9
  • 2. Williams PE. Roles and competencies for distance education programs in higher education institutions. Am J Distance Educ. 2003; 17(1): 45-57[DOI]
  • 3. Olaniyi S. E-learning technology: The nigeria experience. Shaping the change: Xxiii fig congress. 2006;
  • 4. Torruam JT. Application of e-teaching and e-learning in Nigerian educational system. Academic Res Inter. 2012; 3(1): 30
  • 5. Marakas GM, Yi MY, Johnson RD. The multilevel and multifaceted character of computer self-efficacy: Toward clarification of the construct and an integrative framework for research. Inform Systems Res. 1998; 9(2): 126-63
  • 6. Chou CM, Hsiao HC, Shen CH, Chen SC. Analysis of factors in technological and vocational school teachers' perceived organizational innovative climate and continuous use of e-teaching: Using computer self-efficacy as an intervening variable. Turkish Online J Edu Technol. 2010; 9(4): 35-48
  • 7. Ho SC, Kauffman RJ, Liang TP. A growth theory perspective on B2C e-commerce growth in Europe: An exploratory study. Electron Commer Res Appl. 2007; 6(3): 237-59[DOI]
  • 8. Susser B, Ariga T. Teaching e-commerce Web page evaluation and design: a pilot study using tourism destination sites. Computers Education. 2006; 47(4): 399-413[DOI]
  • 9. Zaman M, Anandarajan M, Dai Q. Experiencing flow with instant messaging and its facilitating role on creative behaviors. Computers Human Behav. 2010; 26(5): 1009-8[DOI]
  • 10. Matulich E, Papp R, Haytko DL. Continuous Improvement through Teaching Innovations: a Requirement for Today's Learners. J Mark Educ. 2015; 18(1): 1-7[DOI]
  • 11. Qarabaghy H, Amir Timuori MH, Maghami HR. Examine the relationship between creativity and efficacy of computer technology in teaching undergraduate courses school psychology and educational sciences, Allameh Tabatabai university. J Innovation Creativity Human Sci. 2011; 1(2): 151-78
  • 12. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. 1997;
  • 13. Kinzie MB, Delcourt MA. Computer technologies in teacher education: The measurement of attitudes and self-efficacy. 1991;
  • 14. Wilfong JD. Computer anxiety and anger: the impact of computer use, computer experience, and self-efficacy beliefs. Computers Human Behav. 2006; 22(6): 1001-11[DOI]
  • 15. Dishaw M, Strong D, Bandy DB. Extending the task-technology fit model with self-efficacy constructs. AMCIS 2002 Proceedings. 2002; : 143
  • 16. Olivier TA, Shapiro F. Self-efficacy and computers. J Computer-Based Instruction. 1993; 20(3): 81-5
  • 17. Mustafa K, Bakir N. A needs assessment survey to investigate pre-service teachers' knowledge, experiences and perceptions about preparation to using educational technologies. Turkish Online J Edu Technol. 2010; 9(1)
  • 18. Saade RG, Kira D. Computer anxiety in e-learning: The effect of computer self-efficacy. J Inform Technol Edu. 2009; 8(1): 177-91
  • 19. Compeau DR, Higgins CA. Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS quarterly. 1995; 19(2): 189-211
  • 20. Oproiu GC. A study about using e-learning platform (moodle) in university teaching process. Procedia-Social Behav Sci. 2015; 180: 426-32
  • 21. Gist ME, Schwoerer C, Rosen B. Effects of alternative training methods on self-efficacy and performance in computer software training. J Applied Psychol. 1989; 74(6): 884-91[DOI]
  • 22. Sang G, Valcke M, Braak JV, Tondeur J. Student teachers’ thinking processes and ICT integration: Predictors of prospective teaching behaviors with educational technology. Computer Educ. 2010; 54(1): 103-12[DOI]
  • 23. Karsten R, Roth RM. Computer self-efficacy: A practical indicator of student computer competency in introductory IS courses. Informing Sci. 1998; 1(3): 61-8
  • 24. Bates R, Khasawneh S. Self-efficacy and college students’ perceptions and use of online learning systems. Computers Human Behav. 2007; 23(1): 175-91[DOI]
  • 25. Moreno F, Bailly-Bailliere M. Dise-o instructivo de la formación on-line. . 2002; : 26
  • 26. Stacey E, Wiesenberg F. A study of face-to-face and online teaching philosophies in Canada and Australia. Inter J E-Learning Distance Education. 2007; 22(1): 19-40
  • 27. Bocchi B, Dozza L, Chianese G, Cavrini G. School climate: Comparison between parents' and teachers' perception. Procedia-Social Behav Sci. 2014; 116: 4643-9
  • 28. Gumusluoglu L, Ilsev A. Transformational leadership, creativity, and organizational innovation. J Business Res. 2009; 62(4): 461-73
  • 29. Huang E, Chuang MH. Extending the theory of planned behaviour as a model to explain post-merger employee behaviour of IS use. Computer Human Behav. 2007; 23(1): 240-57[DOI]
  • 30. Neill S, McKee D, Rose GM. Developing the organization's sensemaking capability: Precursor to an adaptive strategic marketing response. Indus Market Manage. 2007; 36(6): 731-44[DOI]
  • 31. Borne JE. Analysis of organizational climate factors as predictors of job satisfaction and job stress for community college counselors. 2008;
  • 32. Basu R. An empirical examination of leader-member exchange and transformational leadership as predictors of innovative behavior. 1991;
  • 33. Mihm J, Loch CH, Wilkinson D, Huberman BA. Hierarchical structure and search in complex organizations. Manage Sci. 2010; 56(5): 831-48[DOI]
  • 34. McMurray A, Scott D. The relationship between organizational climate and organizational culture. J American Academy Business, Cambridge. 2003; 3(1): 1-8
  • 35. Chang JC, Yang YL. The effect of organization's innovational climate on student's creative self-efficacy and innovative behavior. Business Entrepreneurship J. 2012; 1(1): 75-100
  • 36. Chang CP, Chuang HW, Bennington L. Organizational climate for innovation and creative teaching in urban and rural schools. Qual Quant. 2010; 45(4): 935-51[DOI]
  • 37. Rashidi B, Avizhgan M. Implementation and evaluation of electronic teaching of practical and theoretical histology courses: A new experience at isfahan university of medical science [in Persian]. Iran J Med Edu. 2012; 11(9): 1214-22
  • 38. Hung S, Liang T, Chang C. A meta-analysis of empirical research using TAM. J Inform Manag. 2005; 12(4): 211-34
  • 39. Bassam H. The influence of specific computer experiences on computer self-efficacy beliefs. Computers Human Behav. 2003; 19(4): 443-50
  • 40. Paraskeva F, Bouta H, Papagianni A. Individual characteristics and computer self-efficacy in secondary education teachers to integrate technology in educational practice. Computers & Education. 2008; 50(3): 1084-91
  • 41. Pellas N. The influence of computer self-efficacy, metacognitive self-regulation and self-esteem on student engagement in online learning programs: Evidence from the virtual world of Second Life. Computers Human Behav. 2014; 35: 157-70[DOI]
  • 42. Reuvers M, van Engen ML, Vinkenburg CJ, Wilson-Evered E. Transformational leadership and innovative work behaviour: Exploring the relevance of gender differences. Creativity Innovation Manage. 2008; 17(3): 227-44[DOI]
  • 43. Yang S. The structural equation modeling construction and the sex structure invariance assessment of factors affecting innovative behavior of information infused instruction for elementary school teachers. Bulletin Edu Psychol. 2009; 40(3): 385-418
  • 44. Teo T. Modelling technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers. Computers Edu. 2009; 52(2): 302-12[DOI]
  • 45. Weigl T, Hartmann E, Jahns C, Darkow IL. Inter-organizational network structures in Russia: organizational changes from institutional and social embeddedness perspectives. Human Resource Develop Inter. 2008; 11(2): 151-65[DOI]
  • 46. Brinkerhoff J. Effects of a long-duration, professional development academy on technology skills, computer self-efficacy, and technology integration beliefs and practices. J Res Technol Edu. 2006; 39(1): 22-43[DOI]
  • 47. Vajargah KF, Jahani S, Azadmanesh N. Application of ICTS in teaching and learning at university level: The case of shahid beheshti university. Turkish Online J Edu Technol. 2010; 9(2)
  • 48. Anderson S, Maninger R. Preservice teachers' abilities, beliefs, and intentions regarding technology integration. J Edu Computing Res. 2007; 37(2): 151-72[DOI]
  • 49. King EB, Chermont K, West M, Dawson JF, Hebl MR. How innovation can alleviate negative consequences of demanding work contexts: The influence of climate for innovation on organizational outcomes. J Occupation Organization Psychol. 2007; 80(4): 631-45[DOI]
  • 50. Raminmehr KH, Charsetad P. Quantitative research methods using structural equation modeling (In Persian). 2013;
  • 51. Kalantari K. Books processing and analysis of data on socio-economic research (In Persian). 2009;
  • 52. Hooman HA. Structural equation modeling with application lisrel software (in persian). 2009;
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments