Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences

Published by: Kowsar

Qualitative Content Analysis of Activity Theory, Situated Learning and Cognitive Tools and Introducing an Integrated and Conceptual Model

Hashem Fardanesh 1 and Maede Maleki 2 , *
Authors Information
1 Department of Education Faculty, University of Tarbiat Modares, IR Iran
2 University of Tarbiat Modares, IR Iran
Article information
  • Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences: December 2016, 7 (4); e10116
  • Published Online: December 28, 2016
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: October 30, 2016
  • Accepted: December 24, 2016
  • DOI: 10.5812/ijvlms.10116

To Cite: Fardanesh H, Maleki M. Qualitative Content Analysis of Activity Theory, Situated Learning and Cognitive Tools and Introducing an Integrated and Conceptual Model, Interdiscip J Virtual Learn Med Sci. 2016 ; 7(4):e10116. doi: 10.5812/ijvlms.10116.

Abstract
Copyright © 2016, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Introduction
2. Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion and Conclusion
Footnotes
References
  • 1. Barab SA, Evans MA, Baek EO. Activity theory as a lens for characterizing the participatory unit. Handbook of research on educational communications and technology. 2004; 2
  • 2. Barab SA, Duffy T. From practice fields to communities of practice. Theor Foundat Learn Environ. 2000; 1(1): 25-55
  • 3. Westberry NC. An activity theory analysis of social epistemologies within tertiary-level eLearning environments. 2009;
  • 4. Sfard A. On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educ Res. 1998; 27(2): 4-13
  • 5. McGregor D. Developing thinking; developing learning. 2007;
  • 6. Lave J. Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. 1988;
  • 7. Leont’ev AN. Activity, consciousness, and personality. 1978;
  • 8. Engestr Y. Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. 1987;
  • 9. Jonassen DH, Carr C, Yueh HP. Computers as mindtools for engaging learners in critical thinking. Tech Trends. 1998; 43(2): 24-32[DOI]
  • 10. Jonassen DH. Technology as cognitive tools: Learners as designers. ITForum Paper. 1994; 1: 67-80
  • 11. DeVane B, Squire KD. 10 Activity Theory in the Learning Technologies. Theor Foundat Learn Environ. 2012; : 242
  • 12. Engestrom Y. Innovative learning in work teams: Analyzing cycles of knowledge creation in practice. Perspect Activity Theory. 1999; : 377-404
  • 13. Abdullah Z. Activity Theory as Analytical Tool: A Case Study of Developing Student Teachers’ Creativity in Design. Proc Soc Behav Sci. 2014; 131: 70-84
  • 14. Kuutti K. Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction. 1996;
  • 15. Bodker A, Rasmussen TB, Christensen MB. The absorption of chlortetracycline following transscrotal instillation for the treatment of primary hydrocele testis. J Urol. 1991; 145(4): 792-4[PubMed]
  • 16. Bodker S. Through the interface-A human activity approach to user interface design. DAIMI Rep Series. 1987; 16(224)
  • 17. Engestrom Y. Developmental studies of work as a testbench of activity theory: The case of primary care medical practice. Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context . 1993;
  • 18. Collins A. Cognitive apprenticeship and instructional technology. Educational values and cognitive instruction: Implications for reform. 1991; : 121-38
  • 19. Lave J, Wenger E. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. 1991;
  • 20. Fardanesh M, White C. Missed lung cancer on chest radiography and computed tomography. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2012; 33(4): 280-7[DOI][PubMed]
  • 21. Kim B, Reeves TC. Reframing research on learning with technology: In search of the meaning of cognitive tools. Instruct Sci. 2007; 35(3): 207-56
  • 22. Dieterle E. Multi-user virtual environments for teaching and learning. Encyclopedia of Multimedia Technology and Networking, Second Edition. 2009;
  • 23. Mayring P. Qualitative content analysis. Qual Soc Res. 2000; 1(2)
  • 24. Elo S, Kyngas H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008; 62(1): 107-15[DOI][PubMed]
  • 25. Jonassen DH, Rohrer-Murphy L. Activity theory as a framework for designing constructivist learning environments. Educ Technol Res Dev. 1999; 47(1): 61-79
  • 26. Law ELC, Sun X. Evaluating user experience of adaptive digital educational games with Activity Theory. Int J Human Comput Stud. 2012; 70(7): 478-97
  • 27. Goldberg R, Dennen P. Long-term outcomes of acute kidney injury. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2008; 15(3): 297-307[DOI][PubMed]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .
Readers' Comments